Apple M3 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 355

The Apple M3 was designed for desktop systems and is aimed at users looking for balanced computing power.

Manufactured in a 3 nm process, it uses the M3 architecture. It has 20 MB of Level 2 cache, but does without a Level 3 cache. The integrated Apple M3 (10 core) graphics unit handles visual tasks. With a memory bandwidth of 102 GB/s, the system offers a solid basis for everyday applications.

Single-core performance shows a measurable advantage over the rival model, as the difference here is over ten percent. In multi-core scenarios, both processors are on a similar level. In gaming scenarios, the Apple M3 is primarily suitable for optimized software. Power consumption remains low due to the modern process, which minimizes thermal stress.

The price-performance ratio is stable for users in the Apple ecosystem. The Intel Core Ultra 7 355 is based on the Panther Lake architecture and is manufactured using the advanced 2 nm process.

It targets users who need modern interfaces such as PCIe 5.0. The cache structure includes 10 MB Level 2 and 12 MB Level 3 cache. The Intel Xe3 4 Core Graphics 32 EUs (Panther Lake) serves as the graphics solution. With 120 GB/s memory bandwidth, it is equipped for fast data transfers. In single-core performance, the model ranks behind its Apple counterpart.

However, multi-core performance is comparable, as the difference is less than ten percent. In gaming, the Intel Core Ultra 7 355 offers a flexible basis thanks to modern standards. Thermal design performance benefits from the efficient manufacturing process. This processor is recommended for systems with a high demand for data transfer rates for external peripherals.