Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
VS

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) vs Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)

Last updated:
The Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) is based on the M1 architecture and was designed for demanding professional users such as video editors, 3D artists, and software developers who require maximum graphics performance and bandwidth.

It is manufactured by Apple using the 5 nm process. This processor features a powerful CPU configuration and is equipped with a 32-core GPU. PCIe Version 4.0 is relevant. In single-core tests, the Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) shows very good performance. In multi-core applications, it delivers convincing computing power suitable for complex tasks.

Thanks to its 32-core GPU and a maximum memory bandwidth of 410 GB/s, the Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) offers excellent graphics performance and is significantly better suited for gaming scenarios. The high memory bandwidth also supports good AI performance. Despite its high performance, the Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) is known for its energy efficiency, contributing to a longer battery life in mobile devices.

The price-performance ratio heavily depends on the configuration of the specific device in which it is installed. The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) is based on the newer M2 architecture and targets professional users who need improved CPU performance and a solid graphics solution for creative and productive tasks.

It is also manufactured by Apple using the 5 nm process. This processor features a 10-core CPU and a 16-core GPU. PCIe Version 4.0 is relevant. The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) shows noticeably higher single-core performance compared to the Apple M1 Max (32-GPU). In multi-core applications, its performance is very good and comparable to the Apple M1 Max (32-GPU).

With its 16-core GPU and a maximum memory bandwidth of 102 GB/s, the Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) offers good graphics performance for most games, but does not reach the level of the Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) due to fewer GPU cores and lower memory bandwidth. The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) also features high energy efficiency, leading to optimized performance per watt.

The price-performance ratio is determined by the market positioning of the devices in which the processor is used. In summary, the Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) offers superior graphics performance and higher memory bandwidth, making it the better choice for compute-intensive graphical tasks such as professional video editing, 3D rendering, and machine learning.

The Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU), on the other hand, excels with noticeably better single-core performance and very good multi-core performance, making it an excellent choice for general professional applications, software development, and creative work that benefit from a more responsive CPU.

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)

  • 32-core GPU for maximum graphics performance.
  • Very high memory bandwidth of 410 GB/s, beneficial for AI applications.
  • Strong multi-core performance for professional workloads.

Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)

  • Improved single-core performance for fast response times.
  • Efficient 10-core CPU and 16-core GPU for creative tasks.
  • Good energy efficiency for a balanced performance ratio.

Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks

Single-core performance
Rank 2 - 92 %
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
Rank 1 - 100 %
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
Multi-core performance
Rank 1 - 100 %
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
Rank 2 - 97 %
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
Cinebench 2026 Single-Thread

Cinebench 2026 Single-Thread
Single-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
438 pts
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
478 pts
Cinebench 2024 Single-Core

Cinebench 2024 Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
112 pts
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
122 pts
Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core

Cinebench 2024 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
796 pts
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
782 pts
Cinebench R23 Single-Core

Cinebench R23 Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
1,534 pts
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
1,695 pts
Cinebench R23 Multi-Core

Cinebench R23 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
12,402 pts
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
12,125 pts
Geekbench 6 Single-Core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
2,397
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
2,689
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
12,439
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
12,084
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core

Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
1,783
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
1,874
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core

Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.20 GHz
12,693
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 3.50 GHz
12,224
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
Apple M1 Max (32 Core)
10,600
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
Apple M2 Pro (16 Core)
5,680
AI performance (NPU)

AI performance (NPU)

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 0.60 GHz
11.0 TOPS
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 0.66 GHz
15.8 TOPS

More benchmarks

At a glance

Wischen
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
FamilyApple M series (38)Apple M series (38)
CPU groupApple M1 (9)Apple M2 (8)
ArchitectureM1M2
Technology5 nm5 nm
SegmentNotebookNotebook
Socket
PredecessorApple M1 Pro (10-CPU 14-GPU)
SuccessorApple M2 Max (38-GPU)Apple M3 Pro (11-CPU 14-GPU)

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Wischen
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
CPU Cores / Threads10 / 1010 / 10
Hyperthreading / SMT
Core architecturehybrid (big.LITTLE)hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Core Cluster 1: 8x Firestorm
0.60 - 3.20 GHz
6x Avalanche
0.66 - 3.50 GHz
Core Cluster 2: 2x Icestorm
0.60 - 2.06 GHz
4x Blizzard
0.60 - 2.42 GHz
L2-Cache28.00 MB28.00 MB
L3-Cache
Overclocking

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Wischen
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
GPU nameApple M1 Max (32 Core)Apple M2 Pro (16 Core)
GPU frequency0.39 - 1.30 GHz0.45 - 1.40 GHz
CUs / Shader512 / 4096256 / 2048
Raytracing
Max. displays53
Max. GPU Memory32 GB32 GB
Technology5 nm5 nm
Release dateQ3/2021Q1/2023

NPU AI performance

Wischen
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
AI hardwareApple Neural EngineApple Neural Engine
AI specifications16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS16 Neural cores @ 15.8 TOPS
NPU + CPU + iGPU

Memory & PCIe

Wischen
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
MemoryLPDDR5-6400 (409.6 GB/s)
LPDDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s)
Max. Memory64 GB32 GB
Memory channels42
ECCNoNo
PCIe4.04.0
PCIe Bandwidth

Thermal Management

Wischen
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
TDP45 W30 W
TDP (PL2)
TDP up
TDP down
T. junction max.100 °C

Technical details

Wischen
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
Chip designMonolithicMonolithic
AES-NI
Operating systemsmacOSmacOS, iPadOS
Instruction setArmv8.5-A (64 bit)Armv8.5-A (64 bit)
ISA extensionsRosetta 2 x86-EmulationRosetta 2 x86-Emulation
Release dateQ3/2021Q1/2023
Release price
DocumentsTechnical data sheet

Your rating

Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple M1 Max (32-GPU) is 4.8 stars (210 ratings), while Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU) has received 4.4 stars (100 ratings).

Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
10C / 10T · 0.60 - 3.20 GHz
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
Apple M2 Pro (10-CPU 16-GPU)
10C / 10T · 0.66 - 3.50 GHz

Most popular CPUs in both categories

Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
Apple M1 Max (32-GPU)
Buy now on Amazon and save! Buy on Amazon