Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD G-T48E vs Intel Core i7-9700F
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Cinebench R20 Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD G-T48E
9 %
2C / 2T · 1.40 GHz
Intel Core i7-9700F
100 %
8C / 8T · 4.70 GHz
Cinebench R20 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD G-T48E
2 %
2C / 2T · 1.40 GHz
Intel Core i7-9700F
100 %
8C / 8T · 3.80 GHz
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD G-T48E | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD G (38) | Intel Core i7 (300) |
| CPU group | AMD G (13) | Intel Core i 9000 (34) |
| Architecture | Ontario (Bobcat) | Coffee Lake S Refresh |
| Technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1151-2 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor | Intel Core i7-10700F |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD G-T48E | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 8x |
| Frequency: | 1.40 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.70 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.80 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 1.00 MB | 12.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD G-T48E | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.28 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 80 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | |
| Technology | 40 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2010 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD G-T48E | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD G-T48E | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (8.5 GB/s) | DDR4-2666 (42.7 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD G-T48E | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD G-T48E | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q1/2012 | Q2/2019 |
| Release price | 520 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD G-T48E is 3.3 stars (4 ratings), while Intel Core i7-9700F has received 4.3 stars (16 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Core i7-9700F
8C / 8T · 4.70 GHz
9
AMD G-T48E
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
