AMD EPYC 9754S vs Intel Xeon W-3265
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Xeon W-3265 | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 9754S or Intel Xeon W-3265 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 9754S has 128 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.10 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9754S was released in Q2/2023. The Intel Xeon W-3265 has 24 cores with 48 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.60 GHz. The CPU supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3265 was released in Q2/2019. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Xeon W (83) |
| AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) | CPU group | Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) |
| 4 | Generation | 7 |
| Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) | Architecture | Cascade Lake W |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Intel Xeon W-3365 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9754S has 128 CPU cores and can calculate 128 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9754S is 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) while the Intel Xeon W-3265 has 24 CPU cores and 48 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Xeon W-3265 is at 2.70 GHz (4.60 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754S | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3265 |
| 128 | Cores | 24 |
| 128 | Threads | 48 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.25 GHz | Frequency | 2.70 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.60 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.60 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 9754S can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 460.8 GB/s. The Intel Xeon W-3265 supports up to 1024 GB of memory in 6 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 140.7 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754S | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3265 |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 1024 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 140.7 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 33.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 64 |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 63.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 9754S is 360 W, while the Intel Xeon W-3265 has a TDP of 205 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754S | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3265 |
| 360 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 205 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 400 W | TDP up | -- |
| 320 W | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9754S is manufactured in 5 nm and has 256.00 MB cache. The Intel Xeon W-3265 is manufactured in 14 nm and has a 33.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754S | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3265 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| SP5 | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| 10200 $ | Release price | 3320 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
128C 128T @ 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
24C 48T @ 2.70 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9754S
128C 128T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754S
128C 128T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754S
128C 128T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754S
128C 128T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754S
128C 128T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3265
24C 48T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754S | Intel Xeon W-3265 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
