AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Processor U300E

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9754 and the Intel Processor U300E and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 9754 128 core processor released in Q2/2023 with the Intel Processor U300E which has 5 CPU cores and was introduced in Q1/2023.

The AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz). The processor can compute 256 threads at the same time. The Intel Processor U300E clocks with 1.10 GHz (4.30 GHz), has 5 CPU cores and can calculate 6 threads in parallel.

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Up to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9754, while the Intel Processor U300E supports a maximum of 96 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s enabled.

The AMD EPYC 9754 has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the Intel Processor U300E is 15 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

The AMD EPYC 9754 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of Intel Processor U300E is at 10.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 10 nm.