AMD EPYC 9654 vs Apple A17 Pro

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 9654 CPU1 vs CPU2 Apple A17 Pro
AMD EPYC 9654 Apple A17 Pro

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 9654 or Apple A17 Pro - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 9654 has 96 cores with 192 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9654 was released in Q4/2022.

The Apple A17 Pro has 6 cores with 6 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.78 GHz. The CPU supports up to 8 GB of memory in 1 memory channels. The Apple A17 Pro was released in Q3/2023.
AMD EPYC (129) Family Apple A series (22)
AMD EPYC 9004 (21) CPU group Apple A17 (1)
4 Generation 17
Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) Architecture A17
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor Apple A16 Bionic
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 9654 has 96 CPU cores and can calculate 192 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9654 is 2.40 GHz (3.70 GHz) while the Apple A17 Pro has 6 CPU cores and 6 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Apple A17 Pro is at 3.78 GHz.

AMD EPYC 9654 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
96 Cores 6
192 Threads 6
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.40 GHz (3.70 GHz)
96x Zen 4
A-Core 3.78 GHz
-- B-Core 2.11 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD EPYC 9654 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
-- AI hardware Apple Neural Engine
-- AI specifications 16 Neural cores @ 35 TOPS

Internal Graphics

The AMD EPYC 9654 or Apple A17 Pro has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores)
GPU frequency 1.40 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
Technology 3 nm
Max. displays 3
-- Compute units 24
-- Shader 768
No Hardware Raytracing Yes
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 6 GB
-- DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores)
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 Decode / Encode
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC Decode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 9654 can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 460.8 GB/s. The Apple A17 Pro supports up to 8 GB of memory in 1 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s.

AMD EPYC 9654 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
DDR5-4800 Memory LPDDR5-6400
6144 GB Max. Memory 8 GB
12 Memory channels 1 (Single Channel)
460.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Yes ECC No
96.00 MB L2 Cache 20.00 MB
384.00 MB L3 Cache 24.00 MB
5.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
504.1 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 9654 is 360 W, while the Apple A17 Pro has a TDP of 11 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

AMD EPYC 9654 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
360 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) 11 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
400 W TDP up --
320 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 9654 is manufactured in 5 nm and has 480.00 MB cache. The Apple A17 Pro is manufactured in 3 nm and has a 44.00 MB cache.

AMD EPYC 9654 Characteristic Apple A17 Pro
5 nm Technology 3 nm
Chiplet Chip design Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8.6-A (64 bit)
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI ISA extensions --
SP5 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 Operating systems iOS
Q4/2022 Release date Q3/2023
11805 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9654 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.5 stars (4 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Apple A17 Pro to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.9 stars (92 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 9654 (70%)
Apple A17 Pro (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
AMD EPYC 9654 (100%)
Apple A17 Pro (20%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.70 GHz
1529 (71%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
2140 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz
79486 (100%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
5868 (7%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.70 GHz
2025 (69%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
2952 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz
23214 (100%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
7462 (32%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
Apple A17 Pro (6 GPU Cores) @ 1.40 GHz
2147 (100%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
1488440 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
1108570 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 3.55 GHz
126082 (100%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
0 (0%)

Performance for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
96C 192T @ 2.40 GHz
0 (0%)
Apple A17 Pro Apple A17 Pro
6C 6T @ 3.78 GHz
35 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 9654 Apple A17 Pro
Unknown Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Apple A17 ProApple M1 Apple A17 Pro vs Apple M1
2. Apple A17 ProApple M2 Apple A17 Pro vs Apple M2
3. Apple A17 ProApple A16 Bionic Apple A17 Pro vs Apple A16 Bionic
4. Apple A17 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 Apple A17 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for GalaxyApple A17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy vs Apple A17 Pro
6. Apple A17 ProApple M3 Apple A17 Pro vs Apple M3
7. Apple A17 ProGoogle Tensor G3 Apple A17 Pro vs Google Tensor G3
8. Apple A14 BionicApple A17 Pro Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A17 Pro
9. Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)Apple A17 Pro Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU) vs Apple A17 Pro
10. Apple A17 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Apple A17 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3


back to index