AMD EPYC 9474F vs AMD EPYC 9825

In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9474F and the AMD EPYC 9825 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.

We compare the AMD EPYC 9474F 48 core processor released in Q4/2022 with the AMD EPYC 9825 which has 144 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2024.

The AMD EPYC 9474F is a 48 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.60 GHz (4.10 GHz). The processor can compute 96 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 9825 clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 144 CPU cores and can calculate 288 threads in parallel.

The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors.

Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Up to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9474F, while the AMD EPYC 9825 supports a maximum of 6144 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 480.0 GB/s enabled.

The AMD EPYC 9474F has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 9825 is 400 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.

The AMD EPYC 9474F has 304.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 9825 is at 288.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 4 nm.