Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A9-9425 vs AMD EPYC 8024P
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | AMD EPYC 8024P |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | AMD EPYC (147) |
| CPU group | AMD A9-9000 (4) | AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) |
| Architecture | Stoney Ridge (Excavator) | Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) |
| Technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Segment | Notebook | Server |
| Socket | FP4 | SP6 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | AMD EPYC 8024P |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 8x Zen 4c |
| Frequency: | 3.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.10 GHz | 2.95 GHz |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 32.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | AMD EPYC 8024P |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 3 / 192 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 28 nm | |
| Release date | Q2/2016 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | AMD EPYC 8024P |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | AMD EPYC 8024P |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2133 (17.1 GB/s) | DDR5-4800 (230.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 6 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 8 | 5.0 x 96 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 7.9 GB/s | 378.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | AMD EPYC 8024P |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | 90 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | 25 W | 100 W |
| TDP down | 10 W | 70 W |
| T. junction max. | 90 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A9-9425 | AMD EPYC 8024P |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| Release date | Q2/2017 | Q3/2023 |
| Release price | 409 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A9-9425 is 2.1 stars (16 ratings), while AMD EPYC 8024P has received 4.0 stars (1 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
8
AMD EPYC 8024P
8C / 16T · 3.00 GHz
9
AMD A9-9425
2C / 2T · 3.70 GHz
Popular Comparisons
