AMD EPYC 9535 vs AMD EPYC 8024P

The AMD EPYC 9535 is based on the Turin architecture with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This processor is manufactured using a 4-nanometer process and is aimed at companies that require high computing capacity in data centers.

With a memory bandwidth of 480 GB/s and PCIe 5.0 support, it offers fast data processing for demanding applications. In benchmarks, the AMD EPYC 9535 delivers significantly higher multi-core performance compared to the AMD EPYC 8024P.

It is less suitable for gaming due to server optimization, although the L3 cache of 256 MB is large. The thermal design power is designed for maximum computing loads. It is the preferred choice for complex simulations and extensive cloud services, where absolute computing power is crucial. The AMD EPYC 8024P uses the Siena platform based on the Zen 4c architecture.

Production takes place using a 5-nanometer process, with a focus on energy efficiency and optimized operating costs for edge computing. With a memory bandwidth of 230 GB/s and 32 MB L3 cache, the performance is optimized for specialized cloud tasks. Compared to the AMD EPYC 9535, the multi-core performance is lower, but this is offset by reduced energy consumption and a lower TDP.

In gaming scenarios, this processor offers no significant advantage as it was developed for stable server environments. The AMD EPYC 8024P impresses with a fair price-performance ratio in single-socket systems. It is recommended for users who want to build a reliable infrastructure with a focus on efficiency and low thermal loads.