Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD A4-3400 vs Intel Pentium E5200
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
AMD A4-3400
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
Intel Pentium E5200
98 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A4-3400
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
Intel Pentium E5200
97 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
AMD A4-3400
61 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
Intel Pentium E5200
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.50 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-3400 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD A (112) | Intel Pentium (150) |
| CPU group | AMD A4-3000 (3) | Intel Pentium E5000/E6000 (13) |
| Architecture | Llano (K10) | Wolfdale (Penryn) |
| Technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | FM1 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-3400 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x Penryn |
| Frequency: | 2.70 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | 2.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-3400 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | AMD Radeon HD 6410D | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 2 / 160 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 1 GB | |
| Technology | 32 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2010 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-3400 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-3400 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-3400 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD A4-3400 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| Release date | Q3/2011 | Q3/2008 |
| Release price | 28 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD A4-3400 is 3.8 stars (5 ratings), while Intel Pentium E5200 has received 4.3 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
Intel Pentium E5200
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD A4-3400
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
