Intel Atom x5-E8000 Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The Intel Atom x5-E8000 has 4 cores with 4 threads and is based on the 5. gen of the Intel Atom series. The processor uses a mainboard with the BGA 1170 socket and was released in Q1/2016.
CPU lineageThe segment in which we have classified the Intel Atom x5-E8000. Here you can see if it is a desktop processor or a mobile processor or which processor may be the successor of the Intel Atom x5-E8000. |
|
| Name: | Intel Atom x5-E8000 |
| Family: | Intel Atom |
| CPU group: | Intel Atom x3/x5/x7 |
| Segment: | Mobile |
| Generation: | 5 |
| Predecessor: | -- |
| Successor: | -- |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In addition to the number of CPU cores and threads, you can see here whether the Intel Atom x5-E8000 can be overclocked. You will also find the clock frequencies of the processor (single-core and multi-core) here. The number of CPU cores greatly affects the speed of the processor.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 4 / 4 |
| Core architecture: | normal |
| Cores: | 4x |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | No |
| Overclocking: | No |
| Frequency: | 1.04 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core): | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo Frequency (4 Cores): | -- |
Internal Graphics
The Intel Atom x5-E8000 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. A processor with integrated graphics is also called APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).
| GPU name: | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| GPU frequency: | 0.32 GHz |
| GPU (Turbo): | No turbo |
| Execution units: | 12 |
| Shader: | 96 |
| Max. GPU Memory: | 8 GB |
| Max. displays: | 3 |
| Generation: | 8 |
| Direct X: | 12 |
| Technology: | 14 nm |
| Release date: | Q1/2015 |
Hardware codec support
A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit): | No |
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit): | No |
| h264: | Decode / Encode |
| VP8: | Decode |
| VP9: | No |
| AV1: | No |
| AVC: | Decode / Encode |
| VC-1: | Decode |
| JPEG: | Decode |
Memory & PCIeThe memory type as well as the amount of memory can greatly affect the speed of the processor. The memory bandwidth depends on several factors and is given in gigabytes per second. |
|
| Memory type: | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
| Max. Memory: | 8 GB |
| Memory channels: | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| Bandwidth: | -- |
| ECC: | No |
| PCIe: | 2.0 x 4 |
| AES-NI: | Yes |
Thermal ManagementThe Thermal Design Power (TDP for short) specifies the necessary cooling solution to cool the processor sufficiently. The TDP usually only gives a rough idea of the real consumption of a CPU. |
|
| TDP (PL1 / PBP): | 5 W |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | -- |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | 90 °C |
Technical details
Here you will find information on the size of the level 2 and level 3 cache of the Intel Atom x5-E8000 as well as a list of the processors ISA extensions. We have documented the architecture and the manufacturing technology for you as well as the release date.
| Technology: | 14 nm |
| Chip design: | Monolithic |
| Socket: | BGA 1170 |
| L2-Cache: | -- |
| L3-Cache: | 2.00 MB |
| Architecture: | Cherry Trail |
| Operating systems: |
| Virtualization: | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
| Instruction set (ISA): | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date: | Q1/2016 |
| Release price: | 39 $ |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | -- |
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz (2.00 GHz)
buy now on Amazon and save!
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the Intel Atom x5-E8000 have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Turion 64 MK-36
1C 1T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron 847
2C 2T @ 1.10 GHz |
||
|
Intel Pentium E2140
2C 2T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N3050
2C 2T @ 2.16 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core2 Solo SU3500
1C 1T @ 1.40 GHz |
||
|
HiSilicon Kirin 658
8C 8T @ 2.35 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
AMD A4-3420
2C 2T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 3205U
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
2C 2T @ 2.66 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 1000M
2C 2T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core2 Duo E4600
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
Apple A8
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Samsung Exynos 7885
ARM Mali-G71 MP2 @ 1.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Apple A6
PowerVR SGX543MP3 (3 Cores) @ 0.27 GHz |
||
|
MediaTek Helio P25
ARM Mali-T880 MP2 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
Intel HD Graphics 400 @ 0.32 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio P30
ARM Mali-G71 MP2 @ 0.95 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio G88
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
|
|
MediaTek Helio G85
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 @ 1.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.|
|
AMD A4-3300
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N4020
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J4005
2C 2T @ 2.70 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A4-9120C
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A6-6420K
2C 2T @ 4.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6400
4C 4T @ 2.13 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.|
|
Intel Celeron N2810
2C 2T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N2930
4C 4T @ 2.16 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD A4-5000
4C 4T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
AMD E1-6010
2C 2T @ 1.35 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N2910
4C 4T @ 1.60 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Pentium D1509
2C 2T @ 1.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.|
|
Intel Celeron J3355
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J3355E
2C 2T @ 2.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron J3455E
4C 4T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N3350
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 2961Y
2C 2T @ 1.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron N2840
2C 2T @ 2.58 GHz |
||
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (SC)
1,659 entries
1,659 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
1,646 entries
1,646 entries
FP32 SP iGPU
1,872 entries
1,872 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
1,422 entries
1,422 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,101 entries
1,101 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,096 entries
1,096 entries
Leaderboards
In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio.
The best desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best AMD desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best Intel desktop processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best mobile processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best smartphone processors
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
The best gaming CPU
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Fastest integrated graphics ever
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
CPU with the best price/performance ratio
leaderboard 2023
leaderboard 2023
Leaderboards
show more results
show more results
Popular comparisons
