UNISOC T612 vs AMD FX-9370

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


UNISOC T612 CPU1 vs CPU2 AMD FX-9370
UNISOC T612 AMD FX-9370

CPU comparison

UNISOC T612 or AMD FX-9370 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The UNISOC T612 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 0 memory channels. The UNISOC T612 was released in Q1/2022.

The AMD FX-9370 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.70 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD FX-9370 was released in Q3/2013.
UNISOC 4G (10) Family AMD FX (30)
UNISOC 4G 12nm (8) CPU group AMD FX-9000 (2)
0 Generation 2
-- Architecture Vishera (Piledriver)
Mobile Segment Desktop / Server
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The UNISOC T612 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz. The AMD FX-9370 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 4.40 GHz (4.70 GHz).

UNISOC T612 Characteristic AMD FX-9370
8 Cores 8
8 Threads 8
hybrid (big.LITTLE) Core architecture normal
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? Yes
1.80 GHz
2x Cortex-A75
A-Core 4.40 GHz (4.70 GHz)
1.80 GHz
6x Cortex-A55
B-Core --

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

UNISOC T612 Characteristic AMD FX-9370
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

ARM Mali-G57 MP1 GPU no iGPU
0.65 GHz GPU frequency --
-- GPU (Turbo) --
Vallhall 1 GPU Generation --
7 nm Technology
2 Max. displays
2 Compute units --
32 Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory --
12 DirectX Version --

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

ARM Mali-G57 MP1 GPU no iGPU
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
Decode / Encode Codec h264 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 No
Decode / Encode Codec VP8 No
Decode Codec AV1 No
Decode / Encode Codec AVC No
Decode / Encode Codec VC-1 No
Decode / Encode Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The UNISOC T612 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The AMD FX-9370 can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels.

UNISOC T612 Characteristic AMD FX-9370
LPDDR4X-1600 Memory DDR3-1866
Max. Memory
0 Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
-- Max. Bandwidth 29.9 GB/s
No ECC Yes
-- L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 8.00 MB
-- PCIe version --
-- PCIe lanes --
-- PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The UNISOC T612 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD FX-9370 is 220 W.

UNISOC T612 Characteristic AMD FX-9370
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 220 W
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The UNISOC T612 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD FX-9370 cache has a total of 8.00 MB.

UNISOC T612 Characteristic AMD FX-9370
12 nm Technology 32 nm
Unknown Chip design Unknown
Armv8-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
-- Socket AM3+
None Virtualization AMD-V
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 10, Linux
Q1/2022 Release date Q3/2013
-- Release price 195 $
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the UNISOC T612 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 2.5 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the AMD FX-9370 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 0 stars (0 ratings). Rate now:


Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
UNISOC T612 UNISOC T612
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
613 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
UNISOC T612 UNISOC T612
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
3040 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
UNISOC T612 UNISOC T612
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 @ 0.65 GHz
83 (100%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
UNISOC T612 UNISOC T612
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
9652 (100%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
UNISOC T612 UNISOC T612
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
787.9 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
UNISOC T612 UNISOC T612
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.40 GHz
1528 (100%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
UNISOC T612 UNISOC T612
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz
0 (0%)
AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-9370
8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz
699 (100%)

Devices using this processor

UNISOC T612 AMD FX-9370
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. AMD FX-9370AMD FX-8350 AMD FX-9370 vs AMD FX-8350
2. Intel Core i7-4790KAMD FX-9370 Intel Core i7-4790K vs AMD FX-9370
3. AMD FX-8370AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-8370 vs AMD FX-9370
4. UNISOC T612MediaTek Helio G88 UNISOC T612 vs MediaTek Helio G88
5. AMD FX-9370AMD FX-9590 AMD FX-9370 vs AMD FX-9590
6. UNISOC T612Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 UNISOC T612 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
7. AMD FX-8120AMD FX-9370 AMD FX-8120 vs AMD FX-9370
8. Intel Core i5-3570KAMD FX-9370 Intel Core i5-3570K vs AMD FX-9370
9. Intel Core i5-4690AMD FX-9370 Intel Core i5-4690 vs AMD FX-9370
10. Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2AMD FX-9370 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 vs AMD FX-9370


back to index