Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Samsung Exynos 3475 vs Apple A16 Bionic
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
ARM Mali-T720 MP1
Apple A16 Bionic
100 %
Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 3475 | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Samsung Exynos (49) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | Samsung Exynos 3400 (2) | Apple A16 (2) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A7 | A16 |
| Technology | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) | |
| Successor | Apple A17 Pro |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 3475 | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A7 1.30 GHz |
2x Everest 3.46 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Sawtooth 2.02 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 20.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 24.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 3475 | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-T720 MP1 | Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores) |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 0.60 GHz | 0.40 - 1.34 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 1 / 16 | 20 / 640 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 6 GB | |
| Technology | 28nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2013 | Q3/2022 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 3475 | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 17 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 3475 | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-400 | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
| Memory channels | 0 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 3475 | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Samsung Exynos 3475 | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | iOS |
| Instruction set | Armv7-A (32 bit) | Armv8.6-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | 2015 | Q3/2022 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Samsung Exynos 3475 is 1.5 stars (2 ratings), while Apple A16 Bionic has received 4.1 stars (254 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
Samsung Exynos 3475
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
