Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Apple A16 Bionic vs Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Apple A16 Bionic
85 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
100 %
16C / 16T · 5.00 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Apple A16 Bionic
37 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
100 %
16C / 16T · 2.00 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Apple A16 Bionic
23 %
Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores)
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
100 %
Intel Arc B390
AI performance (NPU)
Apple A16 Bionic
34 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
100 %
16C / 16T · 2.00 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A16 Bionic | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Apple A series (27) | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) |
| CPU group | Apple A16 (2) | Intel Core Ultra 300H (8) |
| Architecture | A16 | Panther Lake H |
| Technology | 4 nm | 2 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 2540 | |
| Predecessor | Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) | |
| Successor | Apple A17 Pro |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Apple A16 Bionic | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 16 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x Everest 3.46 GHz |
4x Cougar Cove 2.00 - 5.00 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Sawtooth 2.02 GHz |
8x Skymont 1.60 - 3.80 GHz |
| Core Cluster 3: | 4x Crestmont 1.60 - 3.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 20.00 MB | 18.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 24.00 MB | 24.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Apple A16 Bionic | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores) | Intel Arc B390 |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 1.34 GHz | 0.30 - 2.50 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 20 / 640 | 96 / 1536 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 4 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 6 GB | 64 GB |
| Technology | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Release date | Q3/2022 | Q1/2026 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Apple A16 Bionic | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | Intel® AI Boost |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 17 TOPS | Intel NPU 5 @ 50 TOPS |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Apple A16 Bionic | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) | LPDDR5X-9600 (153.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | 96 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 12 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 47.3 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Apple A16 Bionic | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | 25 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 80 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 15 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Apple A16 Bionic | Intel Core Ultra X7 368H |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | iOS | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8.6-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q3/2022 | Q1/2026 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Apple A16 Bionic is 4.1 stars (259 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has received 4.0 stars (6 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M5 Pro (15-CPU 16-GPU)
15C / 15T · 4.61 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
7
Apple M1 Pro (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 3.20 GHz
8
Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
16C / 16T · 5.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
