Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU1 vs CPU2 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Samsung Exynos 2200 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

CPU comparison

Samsung Exynos 2200 or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. Up to 12 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has 16 cores with 22 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 96 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H was released in Q4/2023.
Samsung Exynos (47) Family Intel Core Ultra 7 (9)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (1) CPU group Intel Core Ultra 100H (5)
6 Generation 1
Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510 Architecture Meteor Lake H
Mobile Segment Mobile
Samsung Exynos 2100 Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is 2.80 GHz while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has 16 CPU cores and 22 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is at 1.40 GHz (4.80 GHz).

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
8 Cores 16
8 Threads 22
hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading Yes
No Overclocking ? No
2.80 GHz
1x Cortex-X2
A-Core 1.40 GHz (4.80 GHz)
6x Redwood Cove
2.52 GHz
3x Cortex-A710
B-Core 0.90 GHz (3.80 GHz)
8x Crestmont
1.82 GHz
4x Cortex-A510
C-Core 0.70 GHz (2.50 GHz)
2x Crestmont

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
-- AI hardware Intel AI engine
-- AI specifications Intel AI Boost @ 1.4 GHz (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT)

Internal Graphics

The Samsung Exynos 2200 or Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake)
1.30 GHz GPU frequency 0.60 GHz
1.30 GHz GPU (Turbo) 2.25 GHz
1 GPU Generation --
4 nm Technology 5 nm
0 Max. displays 4
24 Compute units 128
384 Shader 1024
No Hardware Raytracing Yes
No Frame Generation No
4 GB Max. GPU Memory 32 GB
12 DirectX Version 12.2

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake)
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode Codec VP9 Decode
No Codec VP8 Decode
Decode Codec AV1 Decode / Encode
No Codec AVC Decode / Encode
No Codec VC-1 Decode
No Codec JPEG Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

The Samsung Exynos 2200 can use up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 51.2 GB/s. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H supports up to 96 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 120.0 GB/s.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
LPDDR5-6400 Memory LPDDR5X-7500, DDR5-5600
12 GB Max. Memory 96 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 2 (Dual Channel)
51.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 120.0 GB/s
No ECC No
-- L2 Cache 18.00 MB
-- L3 Cache 24.00 MB
-- PCIe version 5.0
-- PCIe lanes 20
-- PCIe Bandwidth 78.8 GB/s

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is --, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has a TDP of 28 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
-- TDP (PL1 / PBP) 28 W
-- TDP (PL2) 115 W
-- TDP up 65 W
-- TDP down 20 W
-- Tjunction max. 110 °C

Technical details

The Samsung Exynos 2200 is manufactured in 4 nm and has 0.00 MB cache. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 42.00 MB cache.

Samsung Exynos 2200 Characteristic Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
4 nm Technology 7 nm
Unknown Chip design Chiplet
Armv9-A (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit)
-- ISA extensions SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
-- Socket BGA 2049
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
No AES-NI Yes
Android Operating systems Windows 11, Linux
Q1/2022 Release date Q4/2023
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (16 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.3 stars (75 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 2200 (65%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Samsung Exynos 2200 (29%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182 (68%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 4.80 GHz
1746 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586 (30%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 4.20 GHz
11878 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428 (62%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 4.80 GHz
2294 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528 (28%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 4.20 GHz
12749 (100%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422 (32%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Iris Xe 8 Core Graphics 128 EUs (Meteor Lake) @ 2.25 GHz
4460 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 4.80 GHz
1761 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 4.20 GHz
16825 (100%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1128320 (100%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 1.40 GHz
0 (0%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364 (100%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 1.40 GHz
0 (0%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16C 22T @ 4.20 GHz
24916 (100%)

CPU performance per watt (efficiency)

Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
2.80 GHz
0 (0%)
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
16,825 CB R23 MC @ 75 W
224 (100%)

Devices using this processor

Samsung Exynos 2200 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
ASUS Zenbook Duo (2024) UX8406

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core i7-13700H Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core i7-13700H
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
3. Samsung Exynos 2200Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
4. Intel Core Ultra 7 155HAMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5. Intel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core i7-1360P Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs Intel Core i7-1360P
6. Intel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 9 185H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
8. Intel Core Ultra 5 125HIntel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core Ultra 5 125H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
9. Intel Core i9-13900HIntel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Core i9-13900H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 990


back to index