Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G vs Apple A16 Bionic
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Apple A16 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Apple A16 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Apple A16 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Apple A16 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
Multi-core performance
8C / 8T · 2.80 GHz
Apple A16 Bionic
100 %
6C / 6T · 3.46 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) | Apple A series (27) |
| CPU group | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (2) | Apple A16 (2) |
| Architecture | Kryo 265 | A16 |
| Technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | ||
| Predecessor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU) |
| Successor | Apple A17 Pro |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 6 / 6 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Kryo 265 Gold 2.80 GHz |
2x Everest 3.46 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 4x Kryo 265 Silver 1.90 GHz |
4x Sawtooth 2.02 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 20.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 24.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores) |
| GPU frequency | 0.00 GHz | 0.40 - 1.34 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | / 128 | 20 / 640 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 0 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Technology | 11 nm | 4 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2019 | Q3/2022 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Apple Neural Engine | |
| AI specifications | 16 Neural cores @ 17 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR4X-2133 (17.0 GB/s) | LPDDR5-6400 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 6 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G | Apple A16 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Android | iOS |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | Armv8.6-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | ||
| Release date | Q1/2023 | Q3/2022 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G is 4.0 stars (80 ratings), while Apple A16 Bionic has received 4.1 stars (254 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
6
Apple A15 Bionic (4-GPU)
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
8
Apple A16 Bionic
6C / 6T · 0.00 GHz
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
