Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Qualcomm QCM6490 vs Intel Core 3 processor 100U
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Qualcomm QCM6490
100 %
Qualcomm Adreno 643L
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 64 (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm QCM6490 | Intel Core 3 processor 100U |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Qualcomm Snapdragon (105) | Intel Core 3 (5) |
| CPU group | Qualcomm QCM6490 (1) | Intel Core processors - Mobile (Series 1) (3) |
| Architecture | Kryo 670 | Raptor Lake U |
| Technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1744 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm QCM6490 | Intel Core 3 processor 100U |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 6 / 8 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 1x Cortex-A78 2.71 GHz |
2x Redwood Cove 1.20 - 4.70 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 3x Cortex-A78 2.40 GHz |
4x Crestmont 0.90 - 3.30 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 10.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | ||
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm QCM6490 | Intel Core 3 processor 100U |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Qualcomm Adreno 643L | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 64 (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.81 - 0.81 GHz | 0.35 - 1.25 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | / 768 | 64 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 4 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2022 | Q1/2022 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm QCM6490 | Intel Core 3 processor 100U |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Qualcomm AI engine | Intel® AI Boost |
| AI specifications | Intel Deep Learning Boost (Intel DL Boost) | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm QCM6490 | Intel Core 3 processor 100U |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR5-6400 (44.0 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (34.1 GB/s) | LPDDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) DDR5-5200 (83.2 GB/s) LPDDR4X-4266 (68.2 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (51.2 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 96 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 4.0 x 20 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 39.4 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm QCM6490 | Intel Core 3 processor 100U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | 55 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 12 W | |
| T. junction max. | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Qualcomm QCM6490 | Intel Core 3 processor 100U |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q4/2021 | Q1/2024 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Qualcomm QCM6490 is 4.4 stars (15 ratings), while Intel Core 3 processor 100U has received 4.3 stars (34 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
4
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
7
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
8
Qualcomm QCM6490
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Core 3 processor 100U
6C / 8T · 4.70 GHz
Popular Comparisons
