MediaTek MT8317T vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| MediaTek MT8317T | Intel Xeon W-3275 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the MediaTek MT8317T and the Intel Xeon W-3275 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the MediaTek MT8317T 2 core processor released in Q3/2013 with the Intel Xeon W-3275 which has 28 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2019. |
||
| Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Family | Intel Xeon W (83) |
| MediaTek MT83xx A9 (3) | CPU group | Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 (17) |
| 1 | Generation | 7 |
| Cortex-A9 | Architecture | Cascade Lake W |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
| -- | Successor | Intel Xeon W-3375 |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe MediaTek MT8317T is a 2 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.20 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Intel Xeon W-3275 clocks with 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz), has 28 CPU cores and can calculate 56 threads in parallel. |
||
| MediaTek MT8317T | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
| 2 | Cores | 28 |
| 2 | Threads | 56 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 1.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.50 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 4.60 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.40 GHz |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| PowerVR SGX531 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.52 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.52 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| 65nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 1 | Compute units | -- |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 10.1 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| PowerVR SGX531 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to GB of memory in a maximum of 0 memory channels is supported by the MediaTek MT8317T, while the Intel Xeon W-3275 supports a maximum of 1024 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 140.7 GB/s enabled. |
||
| MediaTek MT8317T | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
| Memory | DDR4-2933 | |
| Max. Memory | 1024 GB | |
| 0 | Memory channels | 6 (Hexa Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 140.7 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 38.50 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 64 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 63.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe MediaTek MT8317T has a TDP of --. The TDP of the Intel Xeon W-3275 is 205 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| MediaTek MT8317T | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 205 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe MediaTek MT8317T has 0.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 40 nm. The cache of Intel Xeon W-3275 is at 38.50 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm. |
||
| MediaTek MT8317T | Characteristic | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
| 40 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 |
| -- | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| No | AES-NI | Yes |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2013 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 4250 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
28C 56T @ 2.50 GHz (4.60 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 4.60 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
PowerVR SGX531 @ 0.52 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
MediaTek MT8317T
2C 2T @ 1.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3275
28C 56T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| MediaTek MT8317T | Intel Xeon W-3275 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
