Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
MediaTek MT6732 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
MediaTek MT6732
1 %
ARM Mali-T760 MP2
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
100 %
Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Arrow Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2026 (ST)
218 entries
218 entries
Cinebench 2026 (MC)
219 entries
219 entries
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
140 entries
140 entries
AI performance (NPU)
218 entries
218 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6732 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Intel Core Ultra 7 (31) |
| CPU group | MediaTek MT67xx (17) | Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (20) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A53 | Arrow Lake |
| Technology | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1851 | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6732 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 20 / 20 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 4x Cortex-A53 1.50 GHz |
8x Lion Cove 3.90 - 5.50 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 12x Skymont 3.30 - 4.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 36.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 30.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6732 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-T760 MP2 | Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Arrow Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.50 - 0.50 GHz | 0.30 - 2.00 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 2 / 32 | 4 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 2 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 28nm | 5 nm |
| Release date | Q4/2013 | Q3/2024 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6732 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 37 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6732 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-800 (6.4 GB/s) | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | No | Yes |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 20 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6732 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | 177 W | |
| TDP up | 250 W | |
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6732 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265K |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv8-A (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | |
| Release date | Q3/2014 | Q4/2024 |
| Release price | 394 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of MediaTek MT6732 is 5.0 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has received 4.4 stars (269 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek MT6732
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
6
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
9
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
20C / 20T · 5.50 GHz
Popular Comparisons
