Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
MediaTek MT6592M vs Intel Processor N95
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
MediaTek MT6592M
12 %
ARM Mali-450 MP4
Intel Processor N95
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2026 (ST)
218 entries
218 entries
Cinebench 2026 (MC)
219 entries
219 entries
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
140 entries
140 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6592M | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | MediaTek MT65xx A7 (14) | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) |
| Architecture | Cortex-A9 | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Smartphone / Tablet | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6592M | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 8x Cortex-A7 | 4x Gracemont |
| Frequency: | 1.40 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.40 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.20 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 6.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6592M | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | ARM Mali-450 MP4 | Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.60 - 0.60 GHz | 0.60 - 1.20 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 64 | 16 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 28nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | 2012 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6592M | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6592M | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | LPDDR3-667 (5.3 GB/s) LPDDR2-533 (5.3 GB/s) | DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | |
| Memory channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 9 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6592M | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
MediaTek MT6592M | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Chiplet | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Android | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | Armv7-A (32 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 | |
| Release date | 2014 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of MediaTek MT6592M is 5.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Processor N95 has received 3.9 stars (253 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
MediaTek MT6592M
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M4 (8-CPU)
8C / 8T · 4.46 GHz
8
Apple M2 Ultra (60-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
9
Intel Processor N95
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
