Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Core i9-13900K
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Intel Core i9-13900K | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon W-3175X or Intel Core i9-13900K - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon W-3175X has 28 cores with 56 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 512 GB of memory is supported in 6 memory channels. The Intel Xeon W-3175X was released in Q4/2018. The Intel Core i9-13900K has 24 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 192 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Intel Core i9-13900K was released in Q4/2022. |
||
| Intel Xeon W (83) | Family | Intel Core i9 (78) |
| Intel Xeon W-2100/3100 (15) | CPU group | Intel Core i 13000 (17) |
| 6 | Generation | 13 |
| Skylake W | Architecture | Raptor Lake S |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | Intel Core i9-12900K |
| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Successor | Intel Core i9-14900K |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon W-3175X is a 28 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz). The Intel Core i9-13900K has 24 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900K |
| 28 | Cores | 24 |
| 56 | Threads | 32 |
| normal | Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz) | A-Core | 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz) 8x Raptor Cove |
| -- | B-Core | 2.20 GHz (4.30 GHz) 16x Gracemont |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 1.65 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | 11 |
| Technology | 10 nm | |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| -- | Compute units | 32 |
| -- | Shader | 256 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 64 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | Decode |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon W-3175X supports a maximum of 512 GB of memory in 6 memory channels. The Intel Core i9-13900K can connect up to 192 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900K |
| DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 |
| 512 GB | Max. Memory | 192 GB |
| 6 (Hexa Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 128.1 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | 32.00 MB |
| 38.50 MB | L3 Cache | 36.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | 20 |
| 47.3 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon W-3175X has a TDP of 255 W, that of the Intel Core i9-13900K is 125 W. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900K |
| 255 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 125 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | 253 W |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 85 °C | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon W-3175X has a 38.50 MB cache, while the Intel Core i9-13900K cache has a total of 68.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Characteristic | Intel Core i9-13900K |
| 14 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+ |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | LGA 1700 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Q4/2018 | Release date | Q4/2022 |
| 2999 $ | Release price | 589 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
28C 56T @ 3.10 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
24C 32T @ 3.00 GHz (5.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 6 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 7 CPU benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel UHD Graphics 770 @ 1.65 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 5.50 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
28C 56T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
24C 32T @ 3.00 GHz |
||
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
|
|
Intel Xeon W-3175X
3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Core i9-13900K
39,652 CB R23 MC @ 252 W |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon W-3175X | Intel Core i9-13900K |
| Unknown | Unknown |
News and articles for the Intel Xeon W-3175X and the Intel Core i9-13900K
AMD Ryzen 7000 and Intel Core i 13 Gen at almost 6 GHz clock speed
Posted by Stefan on 2022-08-29
In September, both AMD and Intel are introducing their new mainstream desktop processors. It doesn't seem to have been as close as this year for a long time, leaked benchmarks of the new top models from AMD and Intel point to a head-to-head race.
This year even the 6 GHz clock limit is almost within reach. With a good cooler and some overclocking it should be possible to reach the 6 GHz limit. But even in series production, the manufacturers try to realize the highest possible clock frequency, at least on one core.
This year even the 6 GHz clock limit is almost within reach. With a good cooler and some overclocking it should be possible to reach the 6 GHz limit. But even in series production, the manufacturers try to realize the highest possible clock frequency, at least on one core.
Intel Core i7-13700K could debut with 16 cores and 24 threads
Posted by Stefan on 2022-07-20
According to an internal Intel slide published at the end of last year, the Intel Core i7-13700K could have 8+8, i.e. 16 CPU cores that provide 24 threads. The interesting thing about the slide is that it was recently confirmed by newer leaks of the Intel Core i9-13900K and the Intel Core i5-13600K as the number of cores and also the size of the cache matches with recently published CPU-Z screenshots of alleged development models.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
