Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 CPU1 vs CPU2 Samsung Exynos 2200
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Samsung Exynos 2200

CPU comparison

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 or Samsung Exynos 2200 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 has 12 cores with 24 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz. Up to 768 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 was released in Q3/2014.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz. The CPU supports up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 was released in Q1/2022.
Intel Xeon E5 (71) Family Samsung Exynos (47)
Intel Xeon E5 v3 (32) CPU group Samsung Exynos 2200 (1)
5 Generation 6
Haswell E Architecture Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 Predecessor Samsung Exynos 2100
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 is a 12 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 2200 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.80 GHz.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
12 Cores 8
24 Threads 8
normal Core architecture hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
Yes Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.60 GHz (3.50 GHz) A-Core 2.80 GHz
1x Cortex-X2
-- B-Core 2.52 GHz
3x Cortex-A710
-- C-Core 1.82 GHz
4x Cortex-A510

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs.

no iGPU GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
GPU frequency 1.30 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) 1.30 GHz
-- GPU Generation 1
Technology 4 nm
Max. displays 0
-- Compute units 24
-- Shader 384
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 4 GB
-- DirectX Version 12

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU Samsung Xclipse 920
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode / Encode
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 Decode
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 supports a maximum of 768 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 2200 can connect up to 12 GB of memory in 4 memory channels.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
DDR4-2133 Memory LPDDR5-6400
768 GB Max. Memory 12 GB
4 (Quad Channel) Memory channels 4 (Quad Channel)
68.2 GB/s Max. Bandwidth 51.2 GB/s
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
30.00 MB L3 Cache --
3.0 PCIe version --
40 PCIe lanes --
39.4 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 has a TDP of 135 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 2200 is --.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
135 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
-- TDP up --
-- TDP down --
-- Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 has a 30.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 2200 cache has a total of 0.00 MB.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Characteristic Samsung Exynos 2200
22 nm Technology 4 nm
Monolithic Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv9-A (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 ISA extensions --
LGA 2011-3 Socket --
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows 10, Linux Operating systems Android
Q3/2014 Release date Q1/2022
-- Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.9 stars (7 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the Samsung Exynos 2200 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 3.6 stars (25 ratings). Rate now:


Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 (78%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (100%)
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 (42%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
922 (78%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1182 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.00 GHz
9562 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3586 (38%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
1098 (77%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1428 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.00 GHz
7921 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
3528 (45%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 1.30 GHz
1422 (100%)

AnTuTu 10 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 10 benchmark is one of the best-known benchmarks for mobile processors, which is now available in version 10. There is a version for Android-based smartphones and tablets, as well as a version for Apple mobile devices, i.e. iPhones and iPads.

The Antutu 10 benchmark has 3 phases. In the first phase, the device's RAM is tested, in phase 2 the graphics are tested and in the final phase the entire device is pushed to its performance limits by rendering 3D graphics.

Antutu 10 is therefore ideal for comparing the performance of different devices.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 2.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
1128320 (100%)

AnTuTu 9 Benchmark

The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.

In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 2.60 GHz
0 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
917364 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.00 GHz
16482 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.00 GHz
185.5 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 2.60 GHz
5054 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.50 GHz
135 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
12C 24T @ 3.00 GHz
1914 (100%)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz
0 (0%)

Devices using this processor

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Samsung Exynos 2200
Unknown Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
2. Samsung Exynos 2200Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3. Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 990 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 990
6. Samsung Exynos 2200Samsung Exynos 1380 Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
7. Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 865Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
9. Intel Core i9-9900KIntel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Intel Core i9-9900K vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
10. Apple M1Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 Apple M1 vs Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3


back to index