Intel Xeon E3-1270 vs AMD EPYC 9754
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | AMD EPYC 9754 | |
CPU comparisonIntel Xeon E3-1270 or AMD EPYC 9754 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Intel Xeon E3-1270 has 4 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz. Up to 32 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The Intel Xeon E3-1270 was released in Q2/2011. The AMD EPYC 9754 has 128 cores with 256 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.10 GHz. The CPU supports up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9754 was released in Q2/2023. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3 (43) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Intel Xeon E3 (1) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) |
| 2 | Generation | 4 |
| Sandy-Bridge | Architecture | Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Xeon E3-1270 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 3.40 GHz (3.80 GHz). The AMD EPYC 9754 has 128 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz). |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9754 |
| 4 | Cores | 128 |
| 8 | Threads | 256 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 3.40 GHz | Frequency | 2.25 GHz |
| 3.80 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.10 GHz |
| 3.60 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.10 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe Intel Xeon E3-1270 supports a maximum of 32 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9754 can connect up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9754 |
| DDR3-1333 | Memory | DDR5-4800 |
| 32 GB | Max. Memory | 6144 GB |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 12 |
| 21.3 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 20 | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| 10.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 504.1 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The Intel Xeon E3-1270 has a TDP of 80 W, that of the AMD EPYC 9754 is 360 W. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9754 |
| 80 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 360 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | 400 W |
| -- | TDP down | 320 W |
| -- | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe Intel Xeon E3-1270 has a 8.00 MB cache, while the AMD EPYC 9754 cache has a total of 256.00 MB. |
||
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 9754 |
| 32 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | ISA extensions | SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI |
| LGA 1155 | Socket | SP5 |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 |
| Q2/2011 | Release date | Q2/2023 |
| 339 $ | Release price | 11900 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 8T @ 3.40 GHz (3.80 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Xeon E3-1270
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1270
4C 8T @ 3.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Xeon E3-1270
4C 8T @ 3.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 | AMD EPYC 9754 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
