Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Pentium N3700 vs Intel Processor N95
Last updated:
Summary
The Intel Pentium N3700, introduced in 2015 based on the Braswell architecture using the 14 nm process, was aimed at energy-saving notebooks.
It offered 4 cores, 4 threads, 2 MB Level 3 cache, and an Intel HD Graphics 405 (16EU) with 26 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel Processor N95, released in 2023, utilizes the modern Alder Lake N architecture and is manufactured using the 10 nm (Intel 7) process.
Designed for efficient mini-PCs, it features 4 efficiency cores, 4 threads, 4 MB Level 2 cache, 6 MB Level 3 cache, and an Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake) with 38 GB/s memory bandwidth. In performance comparison, the Intel Processor N95 significantly surpasses the Intel Pentium N3700 in single-core and multi-core performance.
The integrated graphics performance of the Intel Processor N95 is also much higher, which qualifies it for light gaming or media playback. The Intel Pentium N3700 is unsuitable for modern gaming. Both processors are designed for low power consumption. However, despite higher performance, the Intel Processor N95 offers improved energy efficiency.
The price-performance ratio of the Intel Processor N95 is clearly superior. The Intel Pentium N3700 is only relevant today in very old devices.
It offered 4 cores, 4 threads, 2 MB Level 3 cache, and an Intel HD Graphics 405 (16EU) with 26 GB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel Processor N95, released in 2023, utilizes the modern Alder Lake N architecture and is manufactured using the 10 nm (Intel 7) process.
Designed for efficient mini-PCs, it features 4 efficiency cores, 4 threads, 4 MB Level 2 cache, 6 MB Level 3 cache, and an Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake) with 38 GB/s memory bandwidth. In performance comparison, the Intel Processor N95 significantly surpasses the Intel Pentium N3700 in single-core and multi-core performance.
The integrated graphics performance of the Intel Processor N95 is also much higher, which qualifies it for light gaming or media playback. The Intel Pentium N3700 is unsuitable for modern gaming. Both processors are designed for low power consumption. However, despite higher performance, the Intel Processor N95 offers improved energy efficiency.
The price-performance ratio of the Intel Processor N95 is clearly superior. The Intel Pentium N3700 is only relevant today in very old devices.
Intel Pentium N3700
- Very low power consumption
- Older Braswell architecture (14 nm)
- Suitable for very simple tasks
Intel Processor N95
- Significantly higher processing power
- Modern Alder Lake N architecture (10 nm)
- Improved integrated graphics performance
- High energy efficiency
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Pentium N3700
16 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Processor N95
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Pentium N3700
20 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Processor N95
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.20 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Pentium N3700
22 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Processor N95
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Pentium N3700
29 %
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
Intel Processor N95
100 %
4C / 4T · 3.20 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Pentium N3700
58 %
Intel HD Graphics 405 (16EU)
Intel Processor N95
100 %
Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake)
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2026 (ST)
218 entries
218 entries
Cinebench 2026 (MC)
219 entries
219 entries
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
3DMark Timespy (iGPU)
534 entries
534 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
140 entries
140 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Pentium (150) | Intel Processor N (9) |
| CPU group | Intel Pentium J3000/N3700 (3) | Intel Processor N50/N100/N200 (5) |
| Architecture | Braswell | Alder Lake N |
| Technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | BGA 1170 | BGA |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 4x | 4x Gracemont |
| Frequency: | 1.60 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.40 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.40 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | 6.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 405 (16EU) | Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Alder Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.40 - 0.70 GHz | 0.60 - 1.20 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 16 / 128 | 16 / 128 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 3 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Technology | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2015 | Q1/2023 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | DDR5-4800 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-3200 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 4 | 3.0 x 9 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 2.0 GB/s | 8.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 6 W | 15 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4 W | |
| T. junction max. | 90 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Pentium N3700 | Intel Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q2/2015 | Q1/2023 |
| Release price | ||
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Pentium N3700 is 4.1 stars (32 ratings), while Intel Processor N95 has received 3.9 stars (252 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Pentium N3700
4C / 4T · 2.40 GHz
9
Intel Processor N95
4C / 4T · 3.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
