Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T vs Intel Atom C3308
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Atom C3308 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core Ultra 9 (12) | Intel Atom (108) |
| CPU group | Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (20) | Intel Atom C3000 (20) |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake | Denverton |
| Technology | 3 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1851 | BGA 1310 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Atom C3308 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 24 / 24 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | normal |
| Core Cluster 1: | 8x Lion Cove 1.40 - 5.40 GHz |
2x 1.60 - 2.10 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 16x Skymont 1.20 - 4.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 40.00 MB | 4.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 36.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Atom C3308 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Arrow Lake) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 2.00 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 4 / 512 | / |
| Raytracing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2024 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Atom C3308 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 35 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Atom C3308 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) | DDR4-1866 (29.9 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 5.0 x 20 | 3.0 x 6 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 78.8 GB/s | 5.9 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Atom C3308 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35 W | 9.5 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 112 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T | Intel Atom C3308 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 11, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q1/2025 | Q3/2017 |
| Release price | 549 $ | 41 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core Ultra 9 285T is 1.5 stars (61 ratings), while Intel Atom C3308 has received 3.0 stars (2 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
5
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
Intel Atom C3308
2C / 2T · 2.10 GHz
9
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
24C / 24T · 5.40 GHz
Popular Comparisons
