Intel Core Ultra 7 255H AMD Ryzen 7 250
VS

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs AMD Ryzen 7 250

Last updated:
The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, based on Intel's Arrow Lake H architecture, is a 3 nm processor for high-performance mobile systems with Intel Arc 140T graphics.

It is aimed at users who require high computing power for demanding tasks in the mobile sector. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 utilizes AMD's Hawk Point (Zen 4) architecture and is a 4 nm processor for mobile use, equipped with an AMD Radeon 780M iGPU.

It targets users who appreciate a balanced mix of computing power and energy efficiency in their notebooks. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H offers 6 MB L2 and 24 MB L3 cache, with performance and efficiency cores. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 features 8 MB L2 and 16 MB L3 cache, with the Zen 4 architecture known for its efficiency.

In single-core benchmarks, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255H shows over 10 percent higher single-core performance than the AMD Ryzen 7 250. The Intel also significantly outperforms in multi-core. The AMD Radeon 780M of the AMD Ryzen 7 250 traditionally offers good integrated graphics performance for casual gaming and benefits from its architecture.

The Intel Arc 140T benefits from 134 GB/s Max. memory bandwidth, while the AMD benefits from 120 GB/s. Both mobile processors are designed for energy efficiency. Specific TDP values are missing. Without price information, an assessment of the price/performance ratio is not possible. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H impresses with superior computing power in single-core and multi-core applications.

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 offers solid overall performance and strong integrated graphics. For maximum computing power, the Intel is recommended; for balanced mobile gaming, the AMD is recommended.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

  • Arrow Lake H architecture
  • 3 nm manufacturing process
  • Superior single-core and multi-core performance
  • Intel Arc 140T integrated graphics

AMD Ryzen 7 250

  • Hawk Point (Zen 4) architecture
  • 4 nm manufacturing process
  • Strong integrated AMD Radeon 780M graphics
  • Good energy efficiency for mobile applications

Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks

Single-core performance
Rank 1 - 100 %
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Rank 2 - 88 %
AMD Ryzen 7 250
Multi-core performance
Rank 1 - 100 %
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Rank 2 - 68 %
AMD Ryzen 7 250
Cinebench 2026 Single-Thread

Cinebench 2026 Single-Thread
Single-core performance

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
16C / 16T · 5.10 GHz
495 pts
AMD Ryzen 7 250
8C / 16T · 5.10 GHz
421 pts
Cinebench 2026 Multi-Core

Cinebench 2026 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
16C / 16T · 5.10 GHz
2,861 pts
AMD Ryzen 7 250
8C / 16T · 5.10 GHz
3,129 pts
Geekbench 6 Single-Core

Geekbench 6 Single-Core
Single-core performance

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
16C / 16T · 5.10 GHz
2,761
AMD Ryzen 7 250
8C / 16T · 5.10 GHz
2,440
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
16C / 16T · 2.00 GHz
14,339
AMD Ryzen 7 250
8C / 16T · 3.30 GHz
8,200
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Arc 140T
5,458
AMD Ryzen 7 250
AMD Radeon 780M
4,201

More benchmarks

At a glance

Wischen
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen 7 250
FamilyIntel Core Ultra 7 (31)AMD Ryzen 7 (79)
CPU groupIntel Core Ultra 200H (5)AMD Ryzen 200 (11)
ArchitectureArrow Lake HHawk Point (Zen 4)
Technology3 nm4 nm
SegmentNotebookNotebook
SocketBGA 2049FP8
PredecessorIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
SuccessorIntel Core Ultra X7 358H

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Wischen
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen 7 250
CPU Cores / Threads16 / 168 / 16
Hyperthreading / SMT
Core architecturehybrid (big.LITTLE)normal
Core Cluster 1: 6x Lion Cove
2.00 - 5.10 GHz
8x Zen 4
3.30 - 5.10 GHz
Core Cluster 2: 8x Skymont
1.50 - 4.40 GHz
Core Cluster 3: 2x Crestmont
0.70 - 2.50 GHz
L2-Cache6.00 MB8.00 MB
L3-Cache24.00 MB16.00 MB
Overclocking

Integrated graphics (iGPU)

Wischen
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen 7 250
GPU nameIntel Arc 140TAMD Radeon 780M
GPU frequency0.60 - 2.25 GHz0.80 - 2.70 GHz
CUs / Shader64 / 102412 / 768
Raytracing
Max. displays34
Max. GPU Memory32 GB32 GB
Technology5 nm4 nm
Release dateQ1/2025Q1/2023

NPU AI performance

Wischen
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen 7 250
AI hardwareIntel® AI BoostAMD Ryzen™ AI
AI specificationsIntel AI Boost (OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT)AMD Ryzen™ AI (XDNA) @ 16 TOPS
NPU + CPU + iGPU96 TOPS38 TOPS

Memory & PCIe

Wischen
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen 7 250
MemoryLPDDR5X-8400 (134.4 GB/s)
DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s)
LPDDR5X-7500 (120.0 GB/s)
DDR5-5600 (89.6 GB/s)
Max. Memory128 GB256 GB
Memory channels22
ECCNoNo
PCIe5.0 x 284.0 x 20
PCIe Bandwidth110.3 GB/s39.4 GB/s

Thermal Management

Wischen
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen 7 250
TDP28 W28 W
TDP (PL2)115 W
TDP up30 W
TDP down20 W15 W
T. junction max.110 °C100 °C

Technical details

Wischen
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HAMD Ryzen 7 250
Chip designChipletMonolithic
AES-NI
Operating systemsWindows 11, LinuxWindows 11, Linux
Instruction setx86-64 (64 bit)x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensionsSSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512
Release dateQ1/2025Q1/2024
Release price
DocumentsTechnical data sheetTechnical data sheet

Your rating

Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is 3.6 stars (244 ratings), while AMD Ryzen 7 250 has received 4.2 stars (41 ratings).

Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
16C / 16T · 2.00 - 5.10 GHz
AMD Ryzen 7 250
AMD Ryzen 7 250
8C / 16T · 3.30 - 5.10 GHz

Most popular CPUs in both categories

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Buy now on Amazon and save! Buy on Amazon