Intel Core i5-7400T vs Intel Processor N150

The Intel Core i5-7400T, based on the Kaby Lake S architecture, was introduced in the first quarter of 2017 and targeted the mainstream desktop market with a focus on energy efficiency.

It is manufactured using the 14 nm process and features 4 cores and 4 threads, as well as 6 MB of L3 cache. The integrated graphics unit is the Intel HD Graphics 630. The Intel Processor N150, which uses the Twin Lake architecture (based on Alder Lake-N), was launched in the first quarter of 2023 and targets the entry-level and ultra-low-power segment, ideal for compact and fanless systems.

It is manufactured using the more advanced 7 nm process and has 8 cores, 8 threads, 4 MB of L2 cache, and 6 MB of L3 cache. The integrated graphics unit is the Intel UHD Graphics with 24 EUs (Alder Lake). Both processors support PCIe 3.0 and offer a maximum memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s. In single-core performance, the Intel Processor N150 noticeably surpasses the Intel Core i5-7400T.

Multi-core performance is very similar for both processors in Geekbench 6. For gaming, both are only suitable for very light or older games with their integrated graphics solutions (Intel HD Graphics 630 and Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs, respectively), with the N150's newer architecture offering a slight advantage.

The Intel Core i5-7400T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Processor N150 is significantly more energy-efficient with approximately 6.5 watts. This makes the N150 ideal for compact, fanless systems. The Intel Core i5-7400T is primarily available on the used market, while the Intel Processor N150 is found in new mini-PCs.

The price/performance ratio of the Intel Processor N150 is more advantageous for new, low-power systems. The Intel Core i5-7400T is an option for users looking to build a budget system for basic tasks or utilize existing older hardware. The Intel Processor N150, on the other hand, impresses with its modern architecture, significantly higher energy efficiency, and competitive performance with low power consumption.

It is the better choice for new, compact, and energy-saving systems for office applications, web browsing, and light media use.