Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Core i3-4160 vs AMD A4-3420
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Core i3-4160
100 %
2C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
AMD A4-3420
43 %
2C / 2T · 2.80 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Core i3-4160
100 %
2C / 4T · 3.60 GHz
AMD A4-3420
33 %
2C / 2T · 2.80 GHz
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Intel Core i3-4160
100 %
Intel HD Graphics 4400
AMD A4-3420
52 %
AMD Radeon HD 6410D
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4160 | AMD A4-3420 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Core i3 (205) | AMD A (112) |
| CPU group | Intel Core i 4000 (64) | AMD A4-3000 (3) |
| Architecture | Haswell S | Llano (K10) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1150 | FM1 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4160 | AMD A4-3420 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✓ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 2x |
| Frequency: | 3.60 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 3.00 MB | 1.00 MB |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4160 | AMD A4-3420 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | AMD Radeon HD 6410D |
| GPU frequency | 0.35 - 1.15 GHz | 0.60 GHz |
| CUs / Shader | 20 / 160 | 2 / 160 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | 2 |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Technology | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Release date | Q2/2013 | Q4/2010 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4160 | AMD A4-3420 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4160 | AMD A4-3420 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) | DDR3-1600 (25.6 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4160 | AMD A4-3420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 54 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Core i3-4160 | AMD A4-3420 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Unknown |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 | SSE3, SSE4a |
| Release date | Q3/2014 | Q4/2011 |
| Release price | 117 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Core i3-4160 is 3.9 stars (37 ratings), while AMD A4-3420 has received 3.7 stars (3 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
Intel Core i3-4160
2C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
9
AMD A4-3420
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
