Intel Core i3-10100Y vs Intel Processor N150

The Intel Core i3-10100Y is based on the Comet Lake S architecture and is manufactured using the 14 nm process.

This processor is designed for entry-level desktops or space-constrained systems where a balance between basic performance and energy efficiency is desired. Given its performance values, it is recommended for everyday tasks such as web browsing, word processing, and media playback. The integrated graphics solution, Intel UHD Graphics 615, supports basic visual requirements.

The Intel Processor N150 utilizes the Twin Lake architecture and is manufactured using the more advanced 7 nm process.

It targets energy-efficient systems and basic computing tasks that could be used in more compact or fanless designs. Its performance characteristics make it suitable for general office applications, light multitasking scenarios, and operating thin clients or mini-PCs. The integrated graphics unit, Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake), offers a more modern foundation.

Manufacturing Process and Cores/Threads The Intel Core i3-10100Y is manufactured using the 14 nm process. Based on performance values and the typical design of the "Y" series, it can be assumed to have 2 cores and 4 threads. The Intel Processor N150 benefits from a more modern 7 nm manufacturing process, which generally enables higher energy efficiency.

For the Intel Processor N150, the performance values suggest 4 cores and 4 threads. Single-Core and Multi-Core Performance in Benchmarks When evaluating the performance of the Intel Core i3-10100Y, it should be noted that the stated Cinebench R23 multi-core value is lower than the single-core value, indicating an inconsistency in the data.

Therefore, Geekbench 6 performance is used for comparison for the Intel Core i3-10100Y. The Intel Processor N150 shows comparable single-core performance to the Intel Core i3-10100Y in Geekbench 6, but has significantly higher multi-core performance. The Intel Processor N150 also exhibits respectable multi-core performance in Cinebench 2024.

Performance in Gaming Scenarios Neither processor is designed for demanding gaming scenarios. Both feature an integrated graphics solution designed for basic display. The Intel Processor N150 with its Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Alder Lake) and a maximum memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s potentially offers a slightly better foundation for very simple and older games or video streaming compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 615 of the Intel Core i3-10100Y (30 GB/s memory bandwidth).

The N150's more modern architecture can offer a small advantage here. Power Consumption and TDP Specific TDP values are not available. Both processors are designed for energy efficiency due to their orientation ("Y" series and "N" series). The Intel Processor N150, manufactured using the more advanced 7 nm process, is generally expected to have better energy efficiency and thus lower power consumption than the Intel Core i3-10100Y in the 14 nm process.

Price-Performance Ratio and Market Prices Since no current market prices are available for both CPUs, the price-performance ratio cannot be evaluated. Conclusion and Recommendation The Intel Core i3-10100Y is suitable for basic desktop tasks where solid but not demanding computing power is required, and a compact form factor may be a priority.

The Intel Processor N150 offers a more modern manufacturing technology, stronger multi-core performance, and a potentially more powerful integrated graphics solution, making it a better choice for energy-efficient systems with slightly higher parallel processing requirements. For application areas requiring better multi-core performance and a more modern graphics unit, the Intel Processor N150 is the more recommendable option.