Intel Celeron N5100 vs Intel Celeron 6305E

The Intel Celeron N5100 based on the Jasper Lake architecture and the Intel Celeron 6305E from the Tiger Lake U series are designed for different entry-level application areas.

While the Intel Celeron N5100 is primarily found in energy-efficient notebooks and compact desktop systems, the Intel Celeron 6305E is aimed at industrial applications and embedded systems. Both processors are manufactured by Intel using the 10 nm process. The Intel Celeron N5100 has four physical cores and four threads, while the Intel Celeron 6305E has only two cores and two threads.

Both models offer a Level 3 cache of 4 MB, with the Intel Celeron N5100 additionally featuring a Level 2 cache of 2 MB. In benchmarks, the Intel Celeron 6305E shows higher efficiency in multi-core performance despite fewer cores. In single-core performance, different test procedures deliver contradictory results, reflecting the different architectural features.

The memory bandwidth for the Intel Celeron N5100 is 47 GB/s, while the Intel Celeron 6305E reaches 30 GB/s. In gaming scenarios, the Intel Celeron 6305E with Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 and 48 Execution Units offers higher graphical performance than the 24 units of the Intel Celeron N5100.

The Thermal Design Power of the Intel Celeron N5100 is only 6 watts, which favors operation in silent systems. In contrast, the Intel Celeron 6305E at 15 watts usually requires active cooling to ensure stable clock rates. The price-performance ratio is more favorable for home users with the Intel Celeron N5100.

For simple office tasks, the Intel Celeron N5100 is the ideal choice, while the Intel Celeron 6305E is recommended for industrial or graphics-oriented applications.