Intel Celeron N4000 vs Intel Celeron N5095

The Intel Celeron N4000, based on the Gemini Lake architecture, was designed for use in energy-efficient systems such as entry-level laptops and mini-PCs.

It is manufactured using a 14 nm fabrication process and features 2 computing cores and 2 threads. With 4 MB of Level 3 Cache and no Level 2 Cache, it offers basic computing performance for everyday tasks like web browsing or word processing. The integrated graphics solution, Intel UHD Graphics 600, supports basic multimedia applications.

Its maximum memory bandwidth is 38 GB/s. This processor is ideal for users looking for a very cost-effective device for the simplest computing requirements and who value low power consumption. The Intel Celeron N5095, which belongs to the Jasper Lake architecture, is an advancement for the entry-level computer and compact system market.

Manufactured using the more modern 10 nm process, it offers 4 computing cores and 4 threads. With 2 MB of Level 2 Cache and 4 MB of Level 3 Cache, its data processing is more efficient. Compared to the Intel Celeron N4000, it shows significantly increased single-core and multi-core performance.

The integrated graphics unit, Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake), is more powerful and enables smoother playback of media content. The maximum memory bandwidth is 47 GB/s, which further supports system performance. It is a good choice for a noticeably more responsive experience in typical office and media applications.

In a direct comparison, the Intel Celeron N5095 offers significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. This is primarily due to the newer architecture, the finer 10 nm manufacturing process, and the doubling of physical computing cores. For gaming performance, both processors are unsuitable for demanding titles.

However, the Intel Celeron N5095, with its newer and somewhat more powerful integrated graphics unit as well as better CPU performance, would offer a marginally better experience in very simple or older games. Regarding power consumption and thermal design power (TDP), both processors are optimized for energy-efficient applications.

The 10 nm manufacturing process of the Intel Celeron N5095 indicates improved energy efficiency, which allows for higher performance with comparable power consumption. In terms of price-performance ratio, the Intel Celeron N5095 offers significantly increased performance for a moderate extra cost, making it the better choice for most use cases.

The Intel Celeron N4000 remains an option for extremely budget-conscious devices where computing requirements are minimal.