Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Celeron J1900

The Intel Celeron J1900 (Bay Trail) and Intel Celeron N3160 (Braswell) are entry-level processors.

The J1900 was designed for affordable desktops and embedded systems, while the N3160 was for energy-efficient notebooks and mini-PCs. Both are suitable for basic tasks like browsing, office work, and media playback. The Intel Celeron J1900 is manufactured using a 22-nm process, has four cores/four threads, 2 MB L3 cache, and 21 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The integrated graphics solution is Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1). The Intel Celeron N3160 uses a 14-nm process, also offers four cores/four threads, 2 MB L3 cache, and 26 GB/s memory bandwidth with Intel HD Graphics 400. Due to its more advanced manufacturing process, the N3160 is more energy-efficient.

In terms of performance, the Intel Celeron J1900 shows slightly higher multi-core performance, while single-core performance is comparable. Both are sufficient for everyday tasks. For demanding games, these processors are not suitable due to their integrated graphics units and architecture; they are only sufficient for very simple or older titles.

Both processors are very power-efficient. The Intel Celeron N3160 benefits from potentially lower power consumption and more efficient heat dissipation due to the 14-nm process. Their price-performance ratio was good upon introduction. Currently, they are primarily found in older or used systems for simple applications.

In summary, the Intel Celeron J1900 offers slightly better multi-core performance for desktop applications. The Intel Celeron N3160 scores with better energy efficiency due to its more modern manufacturing process, ideal for energy-conscious mini-PCs. Both are suitable for basic office work and media consumption; the N3160 is more advantageous if low power consumption is a priority.