Intel Celeron J4025 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B

The Intel Celeron J4025, based on the 14 nm Gemini Lake architecture, was developed for entry-level desktops and embedded systems.

It offers 2 cores, 2 threads, 4 MB L3 cache, and an integrated Intel UHD Graphics 600 with PCIe 2.0. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B, also manufactured in 14 nm (Zen architecture, codename Great Horned Owl), targets industrial devices and edge computing.

It features 4 cores, 8 threads, 2 MB L2 cache, 4 MB L3 cache, and supports PCIe 3.0. Both CPUs have a maximum memory bandwidth of 38 GB/s. In terms of computing performance, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B significantly outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 in both single-core and multi-core tasks.

Its higher core and thread count enables significantly better multitasking capability. Neither processor is suitable for gaming; their integrated graphics units primarily serve for image output for very simple applications. Both CPUs are designed for energy efficiency. The Intel Celeron J4025 has a very low TDP, ideal for fanless systems.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B offers higher performance with an also low to moderate, often adjustable TDP. Pricewise, the Intel Celeron J4025 is very cost-effective for basic requirements, while the more expensive AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B justifies its higher performance in embedded applications.

In summary, the Intel Celeron J4025 is suitable for inexpensive systems with low requirements and a focus on energy efficiency. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B is the better choice for applications requiring higher computing performance and multitasking capability.