Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron G1620 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron G1620
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
4C / 4T · 2.66 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron G1620
78 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
100 %
4C / 4T · 2.66 GHz
More benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Cinebench R11.5 iGPU
383 entries
383 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Core2 Quad (19) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron G1000 (12) | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8000/Q9000 (16) |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge S | Yorkfield (Penryn) |
| Technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA 1155 | LGA 775 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x | 4x |
| Frequency: | 2.70 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | ||
| Turbo (All Cores): | ||
| L2-Cache | 12.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 2.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | 0.65 - 1.05 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | 6 / 48 | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 2 GB | |
| Technology | 22 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2012 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1333 (21.3 GB/s) | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 16 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 8.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55 W | 95 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | MMX, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1 |
| Release date | Q1/2013 | Q1/2008 |
| Release price | 41 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron G1620 is 3.7 stars (3 ratings), while Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 has received 5.0 stars (5 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
4C / 4T · 0.00 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
4
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
5
Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus
24C / 24T · 5.50 GHz
6
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
8
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
9
Intel Celeron G1620
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
