Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Celeron N4020
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
Geekbench 5, 64bit Single-Core
Single-core performance
Intel Celeron E3400
73 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
Intel Celeron N4020
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.80 GHz
Geekbench 5, 64bit Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron E3400
70 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
Intel Celeron N4020
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.70 GHz
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 Multi-Core
Multi-core performance
Intel Celeron E3400
100 %
2C / 2T · 2.60 GHz
Intel Celeron N4020
100 %
2C / 2T · 1.10 GHz
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Celeron (165) | Intel Celeron (165) |
| CPU group | Intel Celeron E3000 (3) | Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000 (11) |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (Penryn) | Gemini Lake |
| Technology | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Notebook |
| Socket | LGA 775 | BGA 1090 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 2x Core | 2x |
| Frequency: | 2.60 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 2.80 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 2.70 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 1.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 4.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| GPU frequency | 0.20 - 0.65 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 12 / 96 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 8 GB | |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2017 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1066 (17.1 GB/s) DDR2-800 (12.8 GB/s) | LPDDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) DDR4-2400 (38.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | No | No |
| PCIe | 2.0 x 6 | |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 3.0 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65 W | 6 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | 4.8 W | |
| T. junction max. | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N4020 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✗ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 |
| Release date | Q1/2010 | Q4/2019 |
| Release price | 42 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Celeron E3400 is 3.5 stars (2 ratings), while Intel Celeron N4020 has received 2.1 stars (247 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 32-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
2
Apple M5 Max (18-CPU 40-GPU)
18C / 18T · 4.61 GHz
3
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
4
Apple M2 Ultra (76-GPU)
24C / 24T · 3.50 GHz
5
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
6
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
7
Apple M1 Ultra (48-GPU)
20C / 20T · 3.20 GHz
8
Intel Celeron E3400
2C / 2T · 0.00 GHz
9
Intel Celeron N4020
2C / 2T · 2.80 GHz
Popular Comparisons
