Intel Atom x5-E8000 vs AMD FX-8100
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Atom x5-E8000 | AMD FX-8100 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Atom x5-E8000 and the AMD FX-8100 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Atom x5-E8000 4 core processor released in Q1/2016 with the AMD FX-8100 which has 8 CPU cores and was introduced in Q4/2011. |
||
| Intel Atom (108) | Family | AMD FX (30) |
| Intel Atom x3/x5/x7 (9) | CPU group | AMD FX-8000 (11) |
| 5 | Generation | 2 |
| Cherry Trail | Architecture | Vishera (Bulldozer) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Atom x5-E8000 is a 4 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.04 GHz (2.00 GHz). The processor can compute 4 threads at the same time. The AMD FX-8100 clocks with 2.80 GHz (3.70 GHz), has 8 CPU cores and can calculate 8 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Atom x5-E8000 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.04 GHz | Frequency | 2.80 GHz |
| 2.00 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 3.70 GHz |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 400 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.32 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 8 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 14 nm | Technology | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| 12 | Compute units | -- |
| 96 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 8 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel HD Graphics 400 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 8 GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the Intel Atom x5-E8000, while the AMD FX-8100 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Intel Atom x5-E8000 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| DDR3L-1600 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 8 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 25.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 4 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 2.0 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Atom x5-E8000 has a TDP of 5 W. The TDP of the AMD FX-8100 is 95 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Atom x5-E8000 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| 5 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 95 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 90 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Atom x5-E8000 has 2.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 14 nm. The cache of AMD FX-8100 is at 8.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 32 nm. |
||
| Intel Atom x5-E8000 | Characteristic | AMD FX-8100 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 |
| BGA 1170 | Socket | AM3+ |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | |
| Q1/2016 | Release date | Q4/2011 |
| 39 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz (2.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.80 GHz (3.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz |
||
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
Intel HD Graphics 400 @ 0.32 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom x5-E8000
4C 4T @ 1.04 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD FX-8100
8C 8T @ 3.70 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Atom x5-E8000 | AMD FX-8100 |
| Acer NX.EFAET.050 | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
