Intel Atom N475 vs Intel Celeron E3200
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Intel Atom N475 | Intel Celeron E3200 | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the Intel Atom N475 and the Intel Celeron E3200 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the Intel Atom N475 1 core processor released in Q1/2010 with the Intel Celeron E3200 which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2009. |
||
| Intel Atom (108) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
| Intel Atom N400/N500 (3) | CPU group | Intel Celeron E3000 (3) |
| 2 | Generation | 1 |
| Pineview | Architecture | Wolfdale (Penryn) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Intel Atom N475 is a 1 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.83 GHz. The processor can compute 2 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron E3200 clocks with 2.40 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. |
||
| Intel Atom N475 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3200 |
| 1 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.83 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| Intel GMA 3150 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.20 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| -- | GPU Generation | -- |
| 45 | Technology | |
| 0 | Max. displays | |
| 2 | Compute units | -- |
| -- | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 1 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Intel GMA 3150 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| No | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeUp to 2 GB of memory in a maximum of 1 memory channels is supported by the Intel Atom N475, while the Intel Celeron E3200 supports a maximum of 16 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 17.1 GB/s enabled. |
||
| Intel Atom N475 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3200 |
| DDR3-800, DDR2-800 | Memory | DDR3-1066, DDR2-800 |
| 2 GB | Max. Memory | 16 GB |
| 1 (Single Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 6.4 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| 0.50 MB | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe Intel Atom N475 has a TDP of 6.5 W. The TDP of the Intel Celeron E3200 is 65 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| Intel Atom N475 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3200 |
| 6.5 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Intel Atom N475 has 0.50 MB cache and is manufactured in 45 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron E3200 is at 1.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 45 nm. |
||
| Intel Atom N475 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron E3200 |
| 45 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Monolithic | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| MMX, SSE3, SSSE3 | ISA extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 |
| BGA 559 | Socket | LGA 775 |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Linux | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q1/2010 | Release date | Q3/2009 |
| -- | Release price | 47 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 0 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Intel Atom N475
1C 2T @ 1.83 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron E3200
2C 2T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Intel Atom N475 | Intel Celeron E3200 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
