Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom C5320 vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench 2024 (SC)
427 entries
427 entries
Cinebench 2024 (MC)
422 entries
422 entries
Cinebench R23 (SC)
690 entries
690 entries
Cinebench R23 (MC)
665 entries
665 entries
Geekbench 6 (SC)
1,989 entries
1,989 entries
Geekbench 6 (MC)
1,927 entries
1,927 entries
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
213 entries
213 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
190 entries
190 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (SC)
250 entries
250 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Monero Hashrate
94 entries
94 entries
V-Ray CPU-Render
251 entries
251 entries
Cinebench R15 (SC)
1,113 entries
1,113 entries
Cinebench R15 (MC)
1,110 entries
1,110 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5320 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | AMD Ryzen 7 (79) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom C5000 (5) | AMD Ryzen 1000 (15) |
| Architecture | Parker Ridge | Summit Ridge (Zen) |
| Technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 2106 | AM4 (PGA 1331) |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5320 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✓ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 8x | 8x |
| Frequency: | 2.40 GHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 3.70 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 3.30 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | 9.00 MB | |
| L3-Cache | 16.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5320 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | no iGPU |
| GPU frequency | ||
| CUs / Shader | / | / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | ||
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | ||
| Release date |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5320 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5320 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-2933 (46.9 GB/s) | DDR4-2666 (42.7 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 16 | 3.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s | 19.7 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5320 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 41 W | 65 W |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 95 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C5320 | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 10, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| Release date | Q2/2022 | Q1/2017 |
| Release price | 300 $ | |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom C5320 is 0 stars (0 ratings), while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 has received 4.3 stars (29 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
8C / 16T · 3.70 GHz
9
Intel Atom C5320
8C / 8T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
