Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
Intel Atom C3308 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3308 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Intel Atom (108) | Intel Core Ultra 9 (12) |
| CPU group | Intel Atom C3000 (20) | Intel Core Ultra 200 AL-S (20) |
| Architecture | Denverton | Arrow Lake |
| Technology | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Socket | BGA 1310 | LGA 1851 |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3308 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 24 / 24 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Core Cluster 1: | 2x 1.60 - 2.10 GHz |
8x Lion Cove 1.40 - 5.40 GHz |
| Core Cluster 2: | 16x Skymont 1.20 - 4.60 GHz |
|
| L2-Cache | 4.00 MB | 40.00 MB |
| L3-Cache | 36.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✗ | ✓ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3308 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | Intel Xe 4 Core Graphics 64 EUs (Arrow Lake) |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 - 2.00 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 4 / 512 |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB | |
| Technology | 5 nm | |
| Release date | Q3/2024 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3308 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | Intel® AI Boost | |
| AI specifications | Intel AI Boost NPU 4 @ 13 TOPS | |
| NPU + CPU + iGPU | 35 TOPS |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3308 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR4-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | DDR5-6400 (102.4 GB/s) |
| Max. Memory | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| ECC | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe | 3.0 x 6 | 5.0 x 20 |
| PCIe Bandwidth | 5.9 GB/s | 78.8 GB/s |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3308 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 9.5 W | 35 W |
| TDP (PL2) | 112 W | |
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. | 100 °C | 105 °C |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
Intel Atom C3308 | Intel Core Ultra 9 285T |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Monolithic | Monolithic |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Windows 11, Linux |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2 | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| Release date | Q3/2017 | Q1/2025 |
| Release price | 41 $ | 549 $ |
| Documents | Technical data sheet | Technical data sheet |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of Intel Atom C3308 is 1.0 stars (1 ratings), while Intel Core Ultra 9 285T has received 1.5 stars (60 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
6
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
7
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
8
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
24C / 24T · 5.40 GHz
9
Intel Atom C3308
2C / 2T · 2.10 GHz
Popular Comparisons
