HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs AMD Phenom II X4 900e
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 925 | AMD Phenom II X4 900e | |
CPU comparisonHiSilicon Kirin 925 or AMD Phenom II X4 900e - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz. Up to GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 was released in Q3/2014. The AMD Phenom II X4 900e has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 900e was released in Q1/2009. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin (29) | Family | AMD Phenom II (52) |
| HiSilicon Kirin 920 (3) | CPU group | AMD Phenom II - 800/900 (23) |
| 2 | Generation | 4 |
| Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 | Architecture | Deneb (K10) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe HiSilicon Kirin 925 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 1.80 GHz. The AMD Phenom II X4 900e has 4 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.40 GHz. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 900e |
| 8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 4 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 1.80 GHz 4x Cortex-A15 |
A-Core | 2.40 GHz |
| 1.30 GHz 4x Cortex-A7 |
B-Core | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| Midgard 2 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 32nm | Technology | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| 4 | Compute units | -- |
| 64 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 11 | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| No | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | No |
| No | Codec VC-1 | No |
| No | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe HiSilicon Kirin 925 supports a maximum of GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Phenom II X4 900e can connect up to GB of memory in 2 memory channels. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 900e |
| LPDDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR3-1333, DDR2-1066 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| -- | Max. Bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s |
| No | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| -- | PCIe version | -- |
| -- | PCIe lanes | -- |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The HiSilicon Kirin 925 has a TDP of --, that of the AMD Phenom II X4 900e is 65 W. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 900e |
| -- | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe HiSilicon Kirin 925 has a 0.00 MB cache, while the AMD Phenom II X4 900e cache has a total of 6.00 MB. |
||
| HiSilicon Kirin 925 | Characteristic | AMD Phenom II X4 900e |
| 28 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| Armv7-A (32 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| -- | ISA extensions | SSE3, SSE4a |
| -- | Socket | AM3 |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| No | AES-NI | No |
| Android | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q1/2009 |
| -- | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
|
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
AMD Phenom II X4 900e
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 900e
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 900e
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
HiSilicon Kirin 925
8C 8T @ 1.80 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Phenom II X4 900e
4C 4T @ 2.40 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| HiSilicon Kirin 925 | AMD Phenom II X4 900e |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
