Apple M4 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 355

The Apple M4 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 355 represent modern solutions for different computing platforms.

The Apple M4 was developed specifically for the proprietary ecosystem and targets users seeking high efficiency in a closed system. Apple uses a 3-nanometer process for this chip and integrates 20 megabytes of L2 cache without a dedicated L3 cache. In common benchmarks, the Apple M4 achieves significantly higher performance in single-core and multi-core loads compared to the Intel model, with measurable differences clearly exceeding ten percent.

The Apple M4 (10 Core) graphics provide visual output at a memory bandwidth of 120 gigabytes per second. The low thermal load makes it ideal for compact designs. Since the chip is permanently integrated into the hardware, the price-performance ratio depends primarily on the chosen terminal device. The Intel Core Ultra 7 355 is based on the Panther Lake architecture and is designed for versatile systems that require high software compatibility in the Windows environment.

Intel uses an advanced 2-nanometer process for this model. The technical structure combines 10 megabytes of L2 cache with 12 megabytes of L3 cache to optimize the data flow within the architecture. In available benchmarks, the computing power is below that of its competitor, but it provides a solid basis for everyday tasks.

The integrated Intel Xe3 4 Core Graphics 32 EUs handles the graphical calculations at a memory bandwidth of 120 gigabytes per second. Without special 3D cache, its suitability for demanding gaming remains at a moderate level. Pricing is mostly tied to complete systems, with the Panther Lake architecture offering flexible power consumption for various cooling solutions and housing forms.