Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) vs AMD EPYC 7742
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) | AMD EPYC 7742 | |
CPU comparisonApple M1 Max (24-GPU) or AMD EPYC 7742 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) has 10 cores with 10 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz. Up to 64 GB of memory is supported in 4 memory channels. The Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) was released in Q3/2021. The AMD EPYC 7742 has 64 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 7742 was released in Q3/2019. |
||
| Apple M series (25) | Family | AMD EPYC (129) |
| Apple M1 (9) | CPU group | AMD EPYC 7002 (24) |
| 1 | Generation | 2 |
| M1 | Architecture | Rome (Zen 2) |
| Mobile | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| Apple M2 Max (30-GPU) | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) has 10 CPU cores and can calculate 10 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) is 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) while the AMD EPYC 7742 has 64 CPU cores and 128 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 7742 is at 2.25 GHz (3.40 GHz). |
||
| Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7742 |
| 10 | Cores | 64 |
| 10 | Threads | 128 |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core architecture | normal |
| No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) 8x Firestorm |
A-Core | 2.25 GHz (3.40 GHz) |
| 0.60 GHz (2.06 GHz) 2x Icestorm |
B-Core | -- |
NPU AI performanceThe performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is specified here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher. Processors with support for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. |
||
| Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7742 |
| Apple Neural Engine | AI hardware | -- |
| 16 Neural cores @ 11 TOPS | AI specifications | -- |
| -- | NPU + CPU + iGPU | -- |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)The Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) or AMD EPYC 7742 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die. |
||
| Apple M1 Max (24 Core) | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.39 GHz | GPU frequency | -- |
| 1.30 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 1 | GPU Generation | -- |
| 5 nm | Technology | |
| 5 | Max. displays | |
| 384 | Compute units | -- |
| 3072 | Shader | -- |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 32 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| -- | DirectX Version | -- |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| Apple M1 Max (24 Core) | GPU | no iGPU |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | No |
| Decode | Codec VP8 | No |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode | Codec AVC | No |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | No |
Memory & PCIeThe Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) can use up to 64 GB of memory in 4 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 409.6 GB/s. The AMD EPYC 7742 supports up to GB of memory in 8 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 51.2 GB/s. |
||
| Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7742 |
| LPDDR5-6400 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 64 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 4 (Quad Channel) | Memory channels | 8 (Octa Channel) |
| 409.6 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s |
| No | ECC | Yes |
| 28.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
| -- | PCIe lanes | 128 |
| -- | PCIe Bandwidth | 252.0 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) is 45 W, while the AMD EPYC 7742 has a TDP of 225 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7742 |
| 45 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 225 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| -- | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) is manufactured in 5 nm and has 28.00 MB cache. The AMD EPYC 7742 is manufactured in 7 nm and has a 256.00 MB cache. |
||
| Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) | Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7742 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| Armv8.5-A (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 |
| -- | Socket | SP3 |
| Apple Virtualization Framework | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| macOS | Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux |
| Q3/2021 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
| -- | Release price | 9000 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
10C 10T @ 0.60 GHz (3.20 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
64C 128T @ 2.25 GHz (3.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 3.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
Apple M1 Max (24 Core) @ 1.30 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 3.20 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.80 GHz |
||
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
12,402 CB R23 MC @ 45 W |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
2.25 GHz |
||
AI performance (NPU)
The performance values of the processor's AI unit. The isolated NPU performance is given here, the total AI performance (NPU+CPU+iGPU) can be higher.
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. The performance is given in the number (trillions) of arithmetic operations per second (TOPS).
|
|
Apple M1 Max (24-GPU)
10C 10T @ 0.60 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD EPYC 7742
64C 128T @ 2.25 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) | AMD EPYC 7742 |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 (2021) Apple MacBook Pro 16 (2021) |
Unknown |
News and articles for the Apple M1 Max (24-GPU) and the AMD EPYC 7742
Apple M2 Pro with more CPU cores and production in 3 nm ?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-28
After Apple surprisingly presented the normal Apple M2 processor as the first successor to the Apple M1 already in June 2022, the Apple M2 Pro and the Apple M2 Max may follow in autumn. The difference in performance compared to the basic version could be even greater this time and range from 25 to 40 percent.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
In this article we describe how Apple could realize this and why the price should also go up.
Apple M2 vs Apple M1 - What are the differences?
Posted by Stefan on 2022-06-09
During WWDC 2022 on June 6th, 2022 Apple surprisingly presented its new Apple M2 processor. This will initially be installed in a completely revised Apple MacBook Air with 13.6 inches, a even thinner form factor and new colors. Apple also updated the already known (old) Apple MacBook Pro 13.3 with touch bar.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Many leakers had counted on Apple not presenting its new second-generation M processor until the fall. But things turned out differently. And there is very likely a reason for that: the improvements in the Apple M2 are limited compared to the predecessor.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
