AMD Ryzen 7 7700X vs Samsung Exynos 850
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | Samsung Exynos 850 | |
CPU comparisonAMD Ryzen 7 7700X or Samsung Exynos 850 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has 8 cores with 16 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.40 GHz. Up to 128 GB of memory is supported in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X was released in Q4/2022. The Samsung Exynos 850 has 8 cores with 8 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 850 was released in Q2/2020. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 (68) | Family | Samsung Exynos (47) |
| AMD Ryzen 7000 (14) | CPU group | Samsung Exynos 800 (2) |
| 6 | Generation | 4 |
| Raphael (Zen 4) | Architecture | Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 4.50 GHz (5.40 GHz). The Samsung Exynos 850 has 8 CPU cores with a clock frequency of 2.00 GHz. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 8 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| Yes | Overclocking ? | No |
| 4.50 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 5.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 5.20 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsThe integrated graphics unit of a processor is not only responsible for the pure image output on the system, but can also significantly increase the efficiency of the system with the support of modern video codecs. |
||
| AMD Radeon Graphics (Raphael) | GPU | ARM Mali-G52 MP1 |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU frequency | 0.85 GHz |
| 2.20 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | -- |
| 9 | GPU Generation | Bifrost 2 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 16 nm |
| 3 | Max. displays | 2 |
| 2 | Compute units | 1 |
| 128 | Shader | 16 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| 8 GB | Max. GPU Memory | -- |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| AMD Radeon Graphics (Raphael) | GPU | ARM Mali-G52 MP1 |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec AV1 | No |
| Decode / Encode | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| Decode | Codec VC-1 | Decode / Encode |
| Decode / Encode | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD Ryzen 7 7700X supports a maximum of 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The Samsung Exynos 850 can connect up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| DDR5-5200 | Memory | LPDDR4X |
| 128 GB | Max. Memory | |
| 2 (Dual Channel) | Memory channels | 0 |
| 83.2 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | -- |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| 8.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| 32.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | -- |
| 24 | PCIe lanes | -- |
| 94.5 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | -- |
Thermal ManagementThe TDP (Thermal Design Power) of a processor specifies the required cooling solution. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has a TDP of 105 W, that of the Samsung Exynos 850 is --. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| 105 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | -- |
| 142 W | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| -- | TDP up | -- |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 95 °C | Tjunction max. | -- |
Technical detailsThe AMD Ryzen 7 7700X has a 40.00 MB cache, while the Samsung Exynos 850 cache has a total of 0.00 MB. |
||
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | Characteristic | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| 5 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Unknown |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512 | ISA extensions | -- |
| AM5 (LGA 1718) | Socket | -- |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
| Yes | AES-NI | No |
| Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux | Operating systems | Android |
| Q4/2022 | Release date | Q2/2020 |
| 399 $ | Release price | -- |
| show more data | show more data | |
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz (5.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.40 GHz |
||
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
AMD Radeon Graphics (Raphael) @ 2.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
ARM Mali-G52 MP1 @ 0.85 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 9 benchmark is very well suited to measuring the performance of a smartphone. AnTuTu 9 is quite heavy on 3D graphics and can now also use the "Metal" graphics interface. In AnTuTu, memory and UX (user experience) are also tested by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu version 9 can compare any ARM CPU running on Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly comparable when benchmarked on different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 9 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The rating is made up of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the working memory, and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
AnTuTu 8 Benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal graphics.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Blender 3.1 Benchmark
In the Blender Benchmark 3.1, the scenes "monster", "junkshop" and "classroom" are rendered and the time required by the system is measured. In our benchmark we test the CPU and not the graphics card. Blender 3.1 was presented as a standalone version in March 2022.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 4.50 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.40 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
8C 16T @ 5.20 GHz |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
8C 8T @ 2.00 GHz |
||
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
|
|
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
20,399 CB R23 MC @ 104 W |
||
|
|
Samsung Exynos 850
2.00 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD Ryzen 7 7700X | Samsung Exynos 850 |
| Unknown | Unknown |
News and articles for the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and the Samsung Exynos 850
Why the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors for the AM5 socket are currently not a good deal
Posted by Stefan on 2022-10-11
At the end of September 2022, the time had come: AMD presented its latest desktop processors called AMD Ryzen 7000. Initially, 4 processors with 6 to 16 CPU cores were released.
The new socket AM5 (LGA 1718) is used for the first time, which is intended to replace the very durable socket AM4 introduced in 2017 as AMDs mainstream platform. This includes (depending on the chipset) PCIe 5.0 support as well as the exclusive use of DDR5 memory on all AM5 mainboards.
Officially, DDR5-5200 is the maximum, but with AMDs EXPO Technology which is similar to Intel's XMP 3.0, AMD now also has a solution for easy overclocking of the main memory. AMD itself names DDR5-6000 as the sweet spot for the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors.
The new socket AM5 (LGA 1718) is used for the first time, which is intended to replace the very durable socket AM4 introduced in 2017 as AMDs mainstream platform. This includes (depending on the chipset) PCIe 5.0 support as well as the exclusive use of DDR5 memory on all AM5 mainboards.
Officially, DDR5-5200 is the maximum, but with AMDs EXPO Technology which is similar to Intel's XMP 3.0, AMD now also has a solution for easy overclocking of the main memory. AMD itself names DDR5-6000 as the sweet spot for the new AMD Ryzen 7000 processors.
The evolution of AMD Ryzen processors
Posted by Stefan on 2022-09-06
The AMD Ryzen processors are designed for the mid to high-end range and are grouped into the Ryzen 3, Ryzen 5, Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 classes. AMD follows the market leader Intel, which groups its Core i series (Intel Core i3, Core i5, Core i7 and Core i9) identically.
The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.
The AMD Ryzen processors were first introduced by AMD in Q1 2017. They are the successor to the not particularly successful AMD Bulldozer processors. The latter were manufactured using an outdated manufacturing process and could not keep up with the competing products from Intel. AMD lost a large portion of its desktop processor market share during this period.
AMD Ryzen 7000 and Intel Core i 13 Gen at almost 6 GHz clock speed
Posted by Stefan on 2022-08-29
In September, both AMD and Intel are introducing their new mainstream desktop processors. It doesn't seem to have been as close as this year for a long time, leaked benchmarks of the new top models from AMD and Intel point to a head-to-head race.
This year even the 6 GHz clock limit is almost within reach. With a good cooler and some overclocking it should be possible to reach the 6 GHz limit. But even in series production, the manufacturers try to realize the highest possible clock frequency, at least on one core.
This year even the 6 GHz clock limit is almost within reach. With a good cooler and some overclocking it should be possible to reach the 6 GHz limit. But even in series production, the manufacturers try to realize the highest possible clock frequency, at least on one core.
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
