AMD Ryzen 3 3250C vs Intel Processor N150

The AMD Ryzen 3 3250C and the Intel Processor N150 are processors for the entry-level mobile segment.

While the AMD model is based on the Picasso architecture and is primarily found in inexpensive Chromebooks and educational laptops, the Intel variant uses the Twin Lake architecture for particularly energy-efficient notebooks. The AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is manufactured using a 12 nm process with two computing cores and four threads.

In contrast, the Intel Processor N150 offers advanced 7 nm manufacturing and features four computing cores. Benchmarks show a clear superiority of the Intel architecture, as both single-core and multi-core performance exceed the AMD chip by well over ten percent. Both processors have limited usability for gaming scenarios.

The integrated AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics unit and the Intel Graphics 32 EUs reliably handle simple media tasks and video streaming, but fail at demanding graphics applications. Both processors are characterized by very low thermal design power, enabling compact designs and often fanless operation.

The maximum memory bandwidth for both models is an identical 38 GB/s. In terms of price, the AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is positioned in the lowest segment as a proven budget solution. The Intel Processor N150, on the other hand, offers a better ratio of computing power to energy consumption.

For smooth everyday multitasking, the Intel Processor N150 is the recommended choice, whereas the AMD Ryzen 3 3250C provides a sufficient basis for the simplest tasks in the educational sector.