AMD FX-9370 vs AMD EPYC 7702 Benchmark, comparison and differences


AMD FX-9370		AMD EPYC 7702
CPU comparison In this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD FX-9370 and the AMD EPYC 7702 and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster. We compare the AMD FX-9370 8 core processor released in Q3/2013 with the AMD EPYC 7702 which has 64 CPU cores and was introduced in Q3/2019.

AMD FX (30)	Family	AMD EPYC (129)
AMD FX-9000 (2)	CPU group	AMD EPYC 7002 (24)
2	Generation	2
Vishera (Piledriver)	Architecture	Rome (Zen 2)
Desktop / Server	Segment	Desktop / Server
--	Predecessor	--
--	Successor	--

CPU Cores and Base Frequency The AMD FX-9370 is a 8 core processor with a clock frequency of 4.40 GHz (4.70 GHz). The processor can compute 8 threads at the same time. The AMD EPYC 7702 clocks with 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz), has 64 CPU cores and can calculate 128 threads in parallel.
AMD FX-9370	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7702
8	Cores	64
8	Threads	128
normal	Core architecture	normal
No	Hyperthreading	Yes
Yes	Overclocking ?	No
4.40 GHz	Frequency	2.00 GHz
4.70 GHz	Turbo Frequency (1 Core)	3.35 GHz
4.70 GHz	Turbo Frequency (All Cores)	2.50 GHz

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.
AMD FX-9370	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7702
--	AI hardware	--
--	AI specifications	--

Internal Graphics Graphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
	GPU frequency	--
--	GPU (Turbo)	--
--	GPU Generation	--
	Technology
	Max. displays
--	Compute units	--
--	Shader	--
No	Hardware Raytracing	No
No	Frame Generation	No
--	Max. GPU Memory	--
--	DirectX Version	--

Hardware codec support A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.
no iGPU	GPU	no iGPU
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No
No	Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No
No	Codec h264	No
No	Codec VP9	No
No	Codec VP8	No
No	Codec AV1	No
No	Codec AVC	No
No	Codec VC-1	No
No	Codec JPEG	No

Memory & PCIe Up to GB of memory in a maximum of 2 memory channels is supported by the AMD FX-9370, while the AMD EPYC 7702 supports a maximum of GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s enabled.
AMD FX-9370	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7702
DDR3-1866	Memory	DDR4-3200
	Max. Memory
2 (Dual Channel)	Memory channels	8 (Octa Channel)
29.9 GB/s	Max. Bandwidth	51.2 GB/s
Yes	ECC	Yes
--	L2 Cache	--
8.00 MB	L3 Cache	256.00 MB
--	PCIe version	4.0
--	PCIe lanes	128
--	PCIe Bandwidth	252.0 GB/s
Thermal Management The AMD FX-9370 has a TDP of 220 W. The TDP of the AMD EPYC 7702 is 200 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution.
AMD FX-9370	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7702
220 W	TDP (PL1 / PBP)	200 W
--	TDP (PL2)	--
--	TDP up	--
--	TDP down	--
--	Tjunction max.	--
Technical details The AMD FX-9370 has 8.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 32 nm. The cache of AMD EPYC 7702 is at 256.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 7 nm.
AMD FX-9370	Characteristic	AMD EPYC 7702
32 nm	Technology	7 nm
Unknown	Chip design	Chiplet
x86-64 (64 bit)	Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4	ISA extensions	SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
AM3+	Socket	SP3
AMD-V	Virtualization	AMD-V, SVM
Yes	AES-NI	Yes
Windows 10, Linux	Operating systems	Windows 10, Linux
Q3/2013	Release date	Q3/2019
195 $	Release price	8000 $

show more data		show more data

AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.40 GHz (4.70 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save! AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz (3.35 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!

Rate these processors

Average performance in benchmarks

⌀ Single core performance in 1 CPU benchmarks

AMD FX-9370 (57%)

AMD EPYC 7702 (100%)

⌀ Multi core performance in 3 CPU benchmarks

AMD FX-9370 (41%)

AMD EPYC 7702 (84%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	613 (57%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	1079 (100%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	3040 (8%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	37461 (100%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	9652 (14%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	70617 (100%)

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	787.9 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	403.9 (51%)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	996 (100%)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	49035 (100%)

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	1317 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 3.35 GHz	391 (100%)

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	0 (0%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	18857 (100%)

CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)

The CPU-Z benchmark measures a processor's performance by measuring the time it takes the system to complete all benchmark calculations. The faster the benchmark is completed, the higher the score.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.40 GHz	1528 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.00 GHz	0 (0%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.


	AMD FX-9370 8C 8T @ 4.70 GHz	699 (100%)
	AMD EPYC 7702 64C 128T @ 2.50 GHz	0 (0%)


1.		AMD FX-9370 vs AMD FX-8350
2.		Intel Core i7-4790K vs AMD FX-9370
3.		AMD FX-8370 vs AMD FX-9370
4.		AMD EPYC 7742 vs AMD EPYC 7702
5.		AMD FX-9370 vs AMD FX-9590
6.		AMD FX-8120 vs AMD FX-9370
7.		Intel Core i5-3570K vs AMD FX-9370
8.		Intel Core i5-4690 vs AMD FX-9370
9.		Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 vs AMD FX-9370
10.		AMD FX-4170 vs AMD FX-9370

AMD FX-9370 vs AMD EPYC 7702

CPU comparison with benchmarks

CPU comparison

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Internal Graphics

Hardware codec support

Memory & PCIe

Thermal Management

Technical details