Follow us
Share link
Submit benchmark
VS
AMD FX-6200 vs MediaTek MT6575
Last updated:
Benchmarks
Performance Overview
Average performance across multiple benchmarks
Single-core performance
Multi-core performance
More benchmarks
Cinebench R20 (SC)
666 entries
666 entries
Geekbench 5 (SC)
2,512 entries
2,512 entries
Cinebench R20 (MC)
615 entries
615 entries
Geekbench 5 (MC)
2,483 entries
2,483 entries
FP32 SP (iGPU)
2,219 entries
2,219 entries
PassMark CPU-Mark
2,504 entries
2,504 entries
CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (MC)
751 entries
751 entries
Geekbench 3 (SC)
945 entries
945 entries
Geekbench 3 (MC)
941 entries
941 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (SC)
826 entries
826 entries
Cinebench R11.5 (MC)
837 entries
837 entries
Specifications
At a glance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | MediaTek MT6575 |
|---|---|---|
| Family | AMD FX (30) | Mediatek MT-Serie (72) |
| CPU group | AMD FX-6100/6200 (3) | MediaTek MT65xx A9 (7) |
| Architecture | Zambezi (Bulldozer) | Cortex-A9 |
| Technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Segment | Desktop | Smartphone / Tablet |
| Socket | AM3+ | |
| Predecessor | ||
| Successor |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | MediaTek MT6575 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 1 / 1 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT | ✗ | ✗ |
| Core architecture | normal | normal |
| Cores: | 6x | 1x Cortex-A9 |
| Frequency: | 3.80 GHz | 1.00 GHz |
| Turbo (1 Core): | 4.10 GHz | |
| Turbo (All Cores): | 4.10 GHz | |
| L2-Cache | ||
| L3-Cache | 8.00 MB | |
| Overclocking | ✓ | ✗ |
Integrated graphics (iGPU)
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | MediaTek MT6575 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU name | no iGPU | PowerVR SGX531 |
| GPU frequency | 0.52 - 0.52 GHz | |
| CUs / Shader | / | 1 / |
| Raytracing | ✗ | ✗ |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| Max. GPU Memory | ||
| Technology | 65nm | |
| Release date | Q4/2006 |
NPU AI performance
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | MediaTek MT6575 |
|---|---|---|
| AI hardware | ||
| AI specifications | ||
| NPU + CPU + iGPU |
Memory & PCIe
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | MediaTek MT6575 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | DDR3-1866 (29.9 GB/s) | LPDDR2 |
| Max. Memory | ||
| Memory channels | 2 | 0 |
| ECC | Yes | No |
| PCIe | ||
| PCIe Bandwidth |
Thermal Management
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | MediaTek MT6575 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125 W | |
| TDP (PL2) | ||
| TDP up | ||
| TDP down | ||
| T. junction max. |
Technical details
|
Wischen
|
AMD FX-6200 | MediaTek MT6575 |
|---|---|---|
| Chip design | Unknown | Chiplet |
| AES-NI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Operating systems | Windows 10, Linux | Android |
| Instruction set | x86-64 (64 bit) | Armv7-A (32 bit) |
| ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX | |
| Release date | Q2/2012 | 2011 |
| Release price | 95 $ | |
| Documents |
User Reviews
Your rating
Here you can rate one or both of the processors. The average rating of AMD FX-6200 is 4.7 stars (3 ratings), while MediaTek MT6575 has received 0 stars (0 ratings).
Click on the stars to rate one or both processors.
Most popular CPUs in both categories
1
Apple M3 Ultra (28-CPU 60-GPU)
28C / 28T · 4.06 GHz
2
Apple M3 Ultra (32-CPU 80-GPU)
32C / 32T · 4.06 GHz
3
Intel Celeron 450
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
4
Intel Core i5-13600KF
14C / 20T · 5.10 GHz
5
AMD FX-6200
6C / 6T · 4.10 GHz
6
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
8C / 16T · 4.80 GHz
7
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
14C / 28T · 3.30 GHz
8
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
8C / 16T · 4.60 GHz
9
MediaTek MT6575
1C / 1T · 0.00 GHz
Popular Comparisons
