AMD EPYC 9754S vs UNISOC T310

Last updated:

CPU comparison with benchmarks


AMD EPYC 9754S CPU1 vs CPU2 UNISOC T310
AMD EPYC 9754S UNISOC T310

CPU comparison

AMD EPYC 9754S or UNISOC T310 - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.

The AMD EPYC 9754S has 128 cores with 128 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 3.10 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9754S was released in Q2/2023.

The UNISOC T310 has 4 cores with 4 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels. The UNISOC T310 was released in Q2/2019.
AMD EPYC (129) Family UNISOC 4G (10)
AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) CPU group UNISOC 4G 12nm (8)
4 Generation 0
Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) Architecture --
Desktop / Server Segment Mobile
-- Predecessor --
-- Successor --

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

The AMD EPYC 9754S has 128 CPU cores and can calculate 128 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9754S is 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) while the UNISOC T310 has 4 CPU cores and 4 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the UNISOC T310 is at 2.00 GHz.

AMD EPYC 9754S Characteristic UNISOC T310
128 Cores 4
128 Threads 4
normal Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE)
No Hyperthreading No
No Overclocking ? No
2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz)
128x Zen 4c
A-Core 2.00 GHz
1x Cortex-A75
-- B-Core 1.80 GHz
3x Cortex-A55

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Processors with the support of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can process many calculations, especially audio, image and video processing, much faster than classic processors. Algorithms for ML improve their performance the more data they have collected via software. ML tasks can be processed up to 10,000 times faster than with a classic processor.

AMD EPYC 9754S Characteristic UNISOC T310
-- AI hardware --
-- AI specifications --

Internal Graphics

The AMD EPYC 9754S or UNISOC T310 has integrated graphics, called iGPU for short. The iGPU uses the system's main memory as graphics memory and sits on the processor's die.

no iGPU GPU PowerVR GE8300
GPU frequency 0.80 GHz
-- GPU (Turbo) --
-- GPU Generation --
Technology 20 nm
Max. displays 1
-- Compute units 1
-- Shader --
No Hardware Raytracing No
No Frame Generation No
-- Max. GPU Memory 2 GB
-- DirectX Version 10

Hardware codec support

A photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos.

no iGPU GPU PowerVR GE8300
No Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode
No Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No
No Codec h264 Decode / Encode
No Codec VP9 No
No Codec VP8 No
No Codec AV1 No
No Codec AVC No
No Codec VC-1 No
No Codec JPEG No

Memory & PCIe

The AMD EPYC 9754S can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 460.8 GB/s. The UNISOC T310 supports up to GB of memory in 0 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to --.

AMD EPYC 9754S Characteristic UNISOC T310
DDR5-4800 Memory , LPDDR4-1333, LPDDR3-933
6144 GB Max. Memory
12 Memory channels 0
460.8 GB/s Max. Bandwidth --
Yes ECC No
-- L2 Cache --
256.00 MB L3 Cache --
5.0 PCIe version --
128 PCIe lanes --
504.1 GB/s PCIe Bandwidth --

Thermal Management

The thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 9754S is 360 W, while the UNISOC T310 has a TDP of --. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently.

AMD EPYC 9754S Characteristic UNISOC T310
360 W TDP (PL1 / PBP) --
-- TDP (PL2) --
400 W TDP up --
320 W TDP down --
100 °C Tjunction max. --

Technical details

The AMD EPYC 9754S is manufactured in 5 nm and has 256.00 MB cache. The UNISOC T310 is manufactured in 12 nm and has a 0.00 MB cache.

AMD EPYC 9754S Characteristic UNISOC T310
5 nm Technology 12 nm
Chiplet Chip design Unknown
x86-64 (64 bit) Instruction set (ISA) Armv8-A (64 bit)
SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI ISA extensions --
SP5 Socket --
AMD-V, SVM Virtualization None
Yes AES-NI No
Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 Operating systems Android
Q2/2023 Release date Q2/2019
10200 $ Release price --
show more data show more data


Rate these processors

Here you can rate the AMD EPYC 9754S to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 1.0 stars (1 ratings). Rate now:
Here you can rate the UNISOC T310 to help other visitors make their purchasing decisions. The average rating is 4.0 stars (2 ratings). Rate now:


iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD EPYC 9754S AMD EPYC 9754S
@ 0.00 GHz
0 (0%)
UNISOC T310 UNISOC T310
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.80 GHz
51 (100%)

Devices using this processor

AMD EPYC 9754S UNISOC T310
Unknown Unknown

Popular comparisons containing this CPUs

1. UNISOC T310UNISOC T606 UNISOC T310 vs UNISOC T606
2. UNISOC T310UNISOC T610 UNISOC T310 vs UNISOC T610
3. UNISOC T310Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 UNISOC T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
4. UNISOC T310UNISOC T618 UNISOC T310 vs UNISOC T618
5. UNISOC T310MediaTek Helio P22 UNISOC T310 vs MediaTek Helio P22
6. UNISOC T310UNISOC T616 UNISOC T310 vs UNISOC T616
7. AMD EPYC 9754AMD EPYC 9754S AMD EPYC 9754 vs AMD EPYC 9754S
8. UNISOC T310MediaTek MT8183 UNISOC T310 vs MediaTek MT8183
9. UNISOC T310MediaTek Helio A22 UNISOC T310 vs MediaTek Helio A22
10. MediaTek Helio G25UNISOC T310 MediaTek Helio G25 vs UNISOC T310


back to index