UNISOC T310 Benchmark, Test and specs
Last updated:
The UNISOC T310 is a 4 core processor. It can process 4 threads concurrently and is based on the 0. gen of the UNISOC 4G series. The processor was released in Q2/2019.
| Name: | UNISOC T310 |
|---|---|
| Family: | UNISOC 4G (10) |
| CPU group: | UNISOC 4G 12nm (8) |
| Architecture: | |
| Segment: | Mobile |
| Generation: | 0 |
| Predecessor: | -- |
| Successor: | -- |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
The 4 CPU cores of the UNISOC T310 clock with 2.00 GHz. The number of CPU cores and the clock frequency of the processor are largely responsible for the overall performance.
| CPU Cores / Threads: | 4 / 4 |
|---|---|
| Core architecture: | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| A-Core: | 1x Cortex-A75 |
| B-Core: | 3x Cortex-A55 |
| Hyperthreading / SMT: | No |
|---|---|
| Overclocking: | No |
| A-Core Frequency: | 2.00 GHz |
| B-Core Frequency: | 1.80 GHz |
Internal Graphics
With the PowerVR GE8300, the UNISOC T310 has an build in graphic solution. It has 1 SM processors, which have a total of -- texture shaders. The iGPU not only enables games, but also significantly accelerates video playback.
| GPU name: | PowerVR GE8300 |
|---|---|
| GPU frequency: | 0.80 GHz |
| GPU (Turbo): | No turbo |
| Compute units: | 1 |
| Shader: | -- |
| Hardware Raytracing: | No |
| Release date: | Q1/2017 |
| Max. displays: | 1 |
|---|---|
| Generation: | -- |
| Direct X: | 10 |
| Technology: | 20 nm |
| Max. GPU Memory: | 2 GB |
| Frame Generation: | No |
Hardware codec support
Processors that have an integrated graphics can play videos faster and more efficiently. This can have a positive effect on the battery life of notebooks, for example.
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit): | Decode |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit): | No |
| h264: | Decode / Encode |
| VP8: | No |
| VP9: | No |
| AV1: | No |
|---|---|
| AVC: | No |
| VC-1: | No |
| JPEG: | No |
Memory & PCIeThe UNISOC T310 supports up to memory in up to 0 memory channels. This results in a maximum memory bandwidth of --. |
|
| Memory type: | Memory bandwidth: |
|---|---|
LPDDR4-1333 LPDDR3-933 | -- -- -- |
| Max. Memory: | |
| Memory channels: | 0 |
| ECC: | No |
| PCIe: | |
| PCIe Bandwidth: | -- |
Thermal ManagementWith the TDP, the processor manufacturer specifies the cooling solution required for the processor. The UNISOC T310 has a TDP of . |
|
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1 / PBP): | |
| TDP (PL2): | -- |
| TDP up: | -- |
| TDP down: | -- |
| Tjunction max.: | -- |
Technical details
The UNISOC T310 has a 0.00 MB large cache. The processor is manufactured in 12 nm. Modern production increases the efficiency of the processor.
| Technology: | 12 nm |
|---|---|
| Chip design: | |
| Socket: | -- |
| L2-Cache: | -- |
| L3-Cache: | -- |
| AES-NI: | No |
| Operating systems: | Android |
| Virtualization: | None |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA): | Armv8-A (64 bit) |
| ISA extensions: | -- |
| Release date: | Q2/2019 |
| Release price: | -- |
| Part Number: | -- |
| Documents: | Technical data sheet |
4C 4T @ 2.00 GHz
buy now on Amazon and save!
Rate this processor
Benchmark results
The benchmark results for the UNISOC T310 have been carefully checked by us. We only publish benchmark results that have been created by us or that have been submitted by a visitor and then checked by a team member. All results are based on and fullfill our benchmark guidelines.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
Intel Atom E3827
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom E3845
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron J1800
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.79 GHz |
||
|
UNISOC T310
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.80 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom Z3795
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.78 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom Z3775
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.78 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Atom Z3745
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) @ 0.78 GHz |
||
Benchmarks
Popular comparisons
back to index
