AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Celeron 4305U
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Intel Celeron 4305U | |
CPU comparisonIn this CPU comparison, we compare the AMD EPYC 9754 and the Intel Celeron 4305U and use benchmarks to check which processor is faster.
We compare the AMD EPYC 9754 128 core processor released in Q2/2023 with the Intel Celeron 4305U which has 2 CPU cores and was introduced in Q2/2019. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | Intel Celeron (165) |
| AMD EPYC 8004/9004 (15) | CPU group | Intel Celeron 4000 (3) |
| 4 | Generation | 8 |
| Bergamo/Siena (Zen 4c) | Architecture | Whiskey Lake U |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Mobile |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | Intel Celeron 5305U |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9754 is a 128 core processor with a clock frequency of 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz). The processor can compute 256 threads at the same time. The Intel Celeron 4305U clocks with 2.20 GHz, has 2 CPU cores and can calculate 2 threads in parallel. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 4305U |
| 128 | Cores | 2 |
| 256 | Threads | 2 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
| No | Overclocking ? | No |
| 2.25 GHz | Frequency | 2.20 GHz |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | -- |
| 3.10 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | -- |
Internal GraphicsGraphics (iGPU) integrated into the processor not only enable image output without having to rely on a dedicated graphics solution, but can also efficiently accelerate video playback. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
| GPU frequency | 0.30 GHz | |
| -- | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| -- | GPU Generation | 9.5 |
| Technology | 14 nm | |
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| -- | Compute units | 12 |
| -- | Shader | 96 |
| No | Hardware Raytracing | No |
| No | Frame Generation | No |
| -- | Max. GPU Memory | 32 GB |
| -- | DirectX Version | 12 |
Hardware codec supportA photo or video codec that is accelerated in hardware can greatly accelerate the working speed of a processor and extend the battery life of notebooks or smartphones when playing videos. |
||
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (8 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h265 / HEVC (10 bit) | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec h264 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP9 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VP8 | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec AV1 | No |
| No | Codec AVC | Decode / Encode |
| No | Codec VC-1 | Decode |
| No | Codec JPEG | Decode / Encode |
Memory & PCIeUp to 6144 GB of memory in a maximum of 12 memory channels is supported by the AMD EPYC 9754, while the Intel Celeron 4305U supports a maximum of 64 GB of memory with a maximum memory bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s enabled. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 4305U |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | LPDDR3-1866, DDR4-2133 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 64 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 15.8 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe AMD EPYC 9754 has a TDP of 360 W. The TDP of the Intel Celeron 4305U is 15 W. System integrators use the TDP of the processor as a guide when dimensioning the cooling solution. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 4305U |
| 360 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 15 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | -- |
| 400 W | TDP up | -- |
| 320 W | TDP down | 12.5 W |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | 100 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9754 has 256.00 MB cache and is manufactured in 5 nm. The cache of Intel Celeron 4305U is at 2.00 MB. The processor is manufactured in 14 nm. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Characteristic | Intel Celeron 4305U |
| 5 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Monolithic |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 |
| SP5 | Socket | BGA 1528 |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Q2/2023 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
| 11900 $ | Release price | 107 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
128C 256T @ 2.25 GHz (3.10 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
Intel Celeron 4305U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 4305U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
@ 0.00 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 4305U
Intel UHD Graphics 610 @ 0.90 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9754
128C 256T @ 3.10 GHz |
||
|
|
Intel Celeron 4305U
2C 2T @ 2.20 GHz |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9754 | Intel Celeron 4305U |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
