AMD EPYC 9174F vs AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Last updated:
CPU comparison with benchmarks
|
 |
|
| AMD EPYC 9174F | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | |
CPU comparisonAMD EPYC 9174F or AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - which processor is faster? In this comparison we look at the differences and analyze which of these two CPUs is better. We compare the technical data and benchmark results.
The AMD EPYC 9174F has 16 cores with 32 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 4.40 GHz. Up to 6144 GB of memory is supported in 12 memory channels. The AMD EPYC 9174F was released in Q4/2022. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores with 12 threads and clocks with a maximum frequency of 5.00 GHz. The CPU supports up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F was released in Q3/2023. |
||
| AMD EPYC (129) | Family | AMD Ryzen 5 (86) |
| AMD EPYC 9004 (21) | CPU group | AMD Ryzen 7000 (14) |
| 4 | Generation | 6 |
| Genoa / Genoa-X (Zen 4) | Architecture | Raphael (Zen 4) |
| Desktop / Server | Segment | Desktop / Server |
| -- | Predecessor | -- |
| -- | Successor | -- |
|
|
||
CPU Cores and Base FrequencyThe AMD EPYC 9174F has 16 CPU cores and can calculate 32 threads in parallel. The clock frequency of the AMD EPYC 9174F is 4.10 GHz (4.40 GHz) while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 CPU cores and 12 threads can calculate simultaneously. The clock frequency of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is at 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz). |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
| 16 | Cores | 6 |
| 32 | Threads | 12 |
| normal | Core architecture | normal |
| Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
| No | Overclocking ? | Yes |
| 4.10 GHz | Frequency | 3.70 GHz |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo Frequency (1 Core) | 5.00 GHz |
| 4.15 GHz | Turbo Frequency (All Cores) | 4.40 GHz |
Memory & PCIeThe AMD EPYC 9174F can use up to 6144 GB of memory in 12 memory channels. The maximum memory bandwidth is 460.8 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F supports up to 128 GB of memory in 2 memory channels and achieves a memory bandwidth of up to 83.2 GB/s. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR5-5200 |
| 6144 GB | Max. Memory | 128 GB |
| 12 | Memory channels | 2 (Dual Channel) |
| 460.8 GB/s | Max. Bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s |
| Yes | ECC | Yes |
| 16.00 MB | L2 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 32.00 MB |
| 5.0 | PCIe version | 5.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | 24 |
| 504.1 GB/s | PCIe Bandwidth | 94.5 GB/s |
Thermal ManagementThe thermal design power (TDP for short) of the AMD EPYC 9174F is 320 W, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F has a TDP of 65 W. The TDP specifies the necessary cooling solution that is required to cool the processor sufficiently. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
| 320 W | TDP (PL1 / PBP) | 65 W |
| -- | TDP (PL2) | 88 W |
| 400 W | TDP up | 142 W |
| -- | TDP down | -- |
| 100 °C | Tjunction max. | 95 °C |
Technical detailsThe AMD EPYC 9174F is manufactured in 5 nm and has 272.00 MB cache. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is manufactured in 5 nm and has a 38.00 MB cache. |
||
| AMD EPYC 9174F | Characteristic | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
| 5 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
| Chiplet | Chip design | Chiplet |
| x86-64 (64 bit) | Instruction set (ISA) | x86-64 (64 bit) |
| SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI | ISA extensions | SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2,FMA3, AVX2, AVX512 |
| SP5 | Socket | AM5 (LGA 1718) |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Yes | AES-NI | Yes |
| Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11 | Operating systems | Windows 10, Windows 11, Linux |
| Q4/2022 | Release date | Q3/2023 |
| 3850 $ | Release price | 209 $ |
| show more data | show more data | |
16C 32T @ 4.10 GHz (4.40 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
6C 12T @ 3.70 GHz (5.00 GHz) buy now on Amazon and save!
|
||
Rate these processors
Average performance in benchmarks
⌀ Single core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
⌀ Multi core performance in 2 CPU benchmarks
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant here.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, e.g. based on the big.LITTLE concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark result.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench 2024 benchmark is based on the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxon's 3D program Cinema 4D. The benchmark runs are each 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
The Multi-Core test of the Cinebench 2024 benchmark uses all cpu cores to render using the Redshift rendering engine, which is also used in Maxons Cinema 4D. The benchmark run is 10 minutes long to test whether the processor is limited by its heat generation.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 5.00 GHz |
||
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
16C 32T @ 4.15 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
6C 12T @ 4.40 GHz |
||
CPU performance per watt (efficiency)
Efficiency of the processor under full load in the Cinebench R23 (multi-core) benchmark. The benchmark result is divided by the average energy required (CPU package power in watts). The higher the value, the more efficient the CPU is under full load.
|
|
AMD EPYC 9174F
4.10 GHz |
||
|
|
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
14,072 CB R23 MC @ 90 W |
||
Devices using this processor |
|
| AMD EPYC 9174F | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
| Unknown | Unknown |
Popular comparisons containing this CPUs
back to index
